A matter of trust: Public support for country ownership over aid

Kentaro Hirose,Gabriella R. Montinola,Matthew S. Winters,Masaru Kohno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-024-09534-7
2024-03-06
The Review of International Organizations
Abstract:International donors emphasize greater recipient-country ownership in the delivery of foreign assistance because it ostensibly promotes the efficient use of resources and strengthens recipient-country administrative capacity. The preferences of citizens in developing countries, however, are not well understood on this matter. Do they prefer that their own governments control foreign aid resources, or are there conditions under which they instead prefer that donors maintain control over how aid is implemented? We explore these questions through parallel survey experiments in Myanmar, Nepal, and Indonesia. Our experimental vignettes include two informational treatments: one about who implements aid (i.e., the donor or the recipient government) and the other about the trustworthiness of the foreign donor. The trust-in-donor treatment, on average, increases levels of support for aid in all three countries. In contrast, we observe heterogenous average treatment effects regarding aid control: control of aid by the donor rather than the government reduces levels of support in Indonesia and Myanmar, whereas it increases support levels in Nepal. We show how the cross-country variation in ATEs originates in consistent individual-level variation in reactions to aid control that is more shaped by respondents' trust in their own government than their trust in the donor.
economics,international relations,political science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the attitudes of citizens in recipient countries towards the management of foreign aid and the factors influencing these attitudes. Specifically, through survey experiments conducted in Myanmar, Nepal, and Indonesia, the paper investigates the following questions: 1. **Citizens' Preferences for Aid Control**: - Do citizens in recipient countries prefer their own government to control foreign aid resources? - Under what conditions are they more willing to let donors (rather than their own government) control the implementation of aid? 2. **Impact of Trust Factors**: - How does the level of trust citizens have in foreign donors affect their support for aid? - How does the level of trust citizens have in their own government affect their preferences for aid control? Through these survey experiments, the paper attempts to reveal the consistency and differences in citizens' attitudes across different national contexts and further explore whether these findings have universal applicability. ### Main Conclusions - **Trust and Support**: Aid provided by credible donors generally receives higher support (an average increase of 1.26 points on a 10-point scale). - **Differences in Control Preferences**: There are significant differences in citizens' preferences for aid control across different countries. For example, in Indonesia and Myanmar, donor-controlled aid reduces support; whereas in Nepal, it increases support. - **Individual Differences**: An individual's preference for aid control is more dependent on their trust in their own government rather than their trust in donors. These findings help to better understand the attitudes of citizens in recipient countries towards foreign aid, thereby optimizing the effectiveness of aid policies.