Synecdoche and Battles Over the Meaning of “Fracking”

Robert Duffy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1998178
2021-11-25
Environmental Communication
Abstract:In this paper, I undertake a qualitative analysis of promotional materials published by leading players in the fracking controversy within the U.S. to demonstrate how contradictory interpretations of fracking’s impacts came to coexist. I argue that both conclusions – fracking’s safety and fracking’s riskiness – were products not strictly of scientific or technical knowledge, but of the way in which narrative understanding via synecdoche guided interpretation of the science. Through the strategic use of synecdoche, industry attempted to discount most of the problems with the oil/gas drilling process as “unrelated to fracking” and thus make “fracking” appear to be safe. Influential environmental activists, in turn, attempted to alter the term’s meaning to bring these problems back under the umbrella of “fracking.”
What problem does this paper attempt to address?