Abstract:The energy products of oil and gas majors have contributed significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and planetary warming over the past century. Decarbonizing the global economy by mid-century to avoid dangerous climate change thus cannot occur without a profound transformation of their fossil fuel-based business models. Recently, several majors are increasingly discussing clean energy and climate change, pledging decarbonization strategies, and investing in alternative energies. Some even claim to be transforming into clean energy companies. Given a history of obstructive climate actions and “greenwashing”, there is a need to objectively evaluate current and historical decarbonization efforts and investment behavior. This study focuses on two American (Chevron, ExxonMobil) and two European majors (BP, Shell). Using data collected over 2009–2020, we comparatively examine the extent of decarbonization and clean energy transition activity from three perspectives: (1) keyword use in annual reports ( discourse ); (2) business strategies ( pledges and actions ); and (3) production, expenditures and earnings for fossil fuels along with investments in clean energy ( investments ). We found a strong increase in discourse related to “climate”, “low-carbon” and “transition”, especially by BP and Shell. Similarly, we observed increasing tendencies toward strategies related to decarbonization and clean energy. But these are dominated by pledges rather than concrete actions. Moreover, the financial analysis reveals a continuing business model dependence on fossil fuels along with insignificant and opaque spending on clean energy. We thus conclude that the transition to clean energy business models is not occurring, since the magnitude of investments and actions does not match discourse. Until actions and investment behavior are brought into alignment with discourse, accusations of greenwashing appear well-founded.

Greenwashing Consumption: The Didactic Framing of ExxonMobil's Energy Solutions

Eco-Frauds: The Ethics and Impact of Corporate Greenwashing

The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments

The Means and End of Greenwash

No End in Sight? A Greenwash Review and Research Agenda

Greenwashing: Appearance, illusion and the future of 'green' capitalism

Green Dialectics of Media Industry: Advancing Eco Trends and Antienvironmental Behavior

Framing effects on sustainable behavior

Window Dressing in Impression Management: Does Negative Media Coverage Drive Corporate Green Production?

The influence of message frame and product type on green consumer purchase decisions : an ERPs study

The visual stories in addressing climate change that a petroleum business tells and lives by: A multimodal critical ecolinguistic perspective

Consumer perceptions of carbon labeling in print advertising: Hype or effective communication strategy?

Impact of "environmental disclosure greenwashing": a study from the perspective of heterogeneous environmental policies

Climate Change as Represented in Corporate Social Responsibility Reports of American and Chinese Energy Giants: A Critical Frame Analysis Perspective

Perceived Greenwashing and Its Impact on the Green Image of Brands

Bad Greenwashing, Good Greenwashing: Corporate Social Responsibility and Information Transparency

Advertising and Corporate Green Innovation: From the Perspective of Greenwashing

Shades of green deception—An empirical examination into the consequences of greenwashing of innovations

Complicated Green Advertising: Understanding the Promotion of Clothing Recycling Efforts

Green Talk or Green Walk: Chinese Consumer Positive Word-of-Mouth to Corporate Environmental Actions in Polluting Industries

Advertising, ecolabeling and consumers' beliefs: Greenwashing or not?