Window Dressing in Impression Management: Does Negative Media Coverage Drive Corporate Green Production?

Kaijun Gan,Silin Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020861
IF: 3.9
2024-01-20
Sustainability
Abstract:This study addresses the calls for research attention on corporate greenwashing and analyzes an environmental strategy in corporate impression management. We assume that negative media coverage triggers impression motivation and causes firms to adopt environmental strategies for impression construction based on the two-component model in impression management. Specifically, firms release credible signals, such as green investment, to cover concealed pollution emissions under the framework of a game with incomplete information. We posit that firms can select a window-dressing strategy under the pressures of negative media coverage by constructing two regression models, respectively. We also assess our underlying assumption of constraints from state ownership and institutional shareholdings by testing additional moderating relationships. Utilizing a sample of Chinese publicly listed firms from 2000 to 2010, our empirical results suggest that negative media coverage increases corporate green investment, but pollutant emissions are reduced correspondingly, and state ownership aggravates corporate window dressing while institutional shareholdings curb it. Our findings reveal the corporate social irresponsibility in environmental protection and sustainable development, and they offer important implications for firm stakeholders.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The issue discussed in this paper is whether negative media coverage drives companies to adopt green production strategies for impression management. The question is whether companies engage in "window dressing" by increasing green investments to hide pollution emissions rather than actually reducing pollution in response to negative publicity. The study further analyzes how ownership structures, such as state ownership and institutional shareholding, influence the choice of this strategy. By conducting empirical research on a sample of Chinese listed companies from 2000 to 2010, the paper finds that negative media coverage does increase a company's green investments, but pollution emissions do not decrease accordingly. Additionally, state ownership may exacerbate this "window dressing" behavior, while institutional shareholding may serve as a deterrent. These findings reveal the lack of corporate action in environmental protection and social responsibility, providing important insights for stakeholders.