Abstract:People's attitudes towards hydraulic fracturing (fracking) can be shaped by socio-demographics, economic development, social equity and politics, environmental impacts, and fracking-related information. Existing research typically conducts surveys and interviews to study public attitudes towards fracking among a small group of individuals in a specific geographic area, where limited samples may introduce bias. Here, we compiled geo-referenced social media big data from Twitter during 2018–2019 for the entire United States to present a more holistic picture of people's attitudes towards fracking. We used a multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) to investigate county-level relationships between the aforementioned factors and percentages of negative tweets concerning fracking. Results indicate spatial heterogeneity and varying scales of those associations. Counties with higher median household income, larger African American populations, and/or lower educational level are less likely to oppose fracking, and these associations show global stationarity in all contiguous US counties. Eastern and Central US counties with higher unemployment rates, counties east of the Great Plains with less fracking sites nearby, and Western and Gulf Coast region counties with higher health insurance enrolments are more likely to oppose fracking activities. These three variables show clear East-West geographical divides in influencing public perspective on fracking. In counties across the southern Great Plains, negative attitudes towards fracking are less often vocalized on Twitter as the share of Republican voters increases. These findings have implications for both predicting public perspectives and needed policy adjustments. The methodology can also be conveniently applied to investigate public perspectives on other controversial topics.

Defusing a carbon bomb: Exploring the strategies of anti-fracking activists in Mexico

“No Fracking Way!” Documentary Film, Discursive Opportunity, and Local Opposition against Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States, 2010 to 2013

Searching for a Public in Controversies over Carbon Dioxide Removal: An Issue Mapping Study on BECCS and Afforestation

Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom

Understanding public perspectives on fracking in the United States using social media big data

Fracking and Framing: A Comparative Analysis of Media Coverage of Hydraulic Fracturing in Canadian and US Newspapers

Effect of Providing Information on Students’ Knowledge and Concerns about Hydraulic Fracking

The International Politics of Carbon Dioxide Removal: Pathways to Cooperative Global Governance

Rethinking Wedges

Synecdoche and Battles Over the Meaning of “Fracking”

Assessing how energy companies negotiate with landowners when obtaining land for hydraulic fracturing

Engaging Truthiness and Obfuscation in a Political Ecology Analysis of a Protest Against the Pengzhou Petroleum Refinery

Contesting Moral Capital in the Economy of Expectations of an Extractive Frontier

Capture the fugitive gas: Two ideas to design more effective policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

Shale gas: Opportunities and challenges

Dialogue and Disruption at the Doorstep: Participant Perceptions during a City Walk as a Climate Communication Format

The shale gas revolution: Barriers, sustainability, and emerging opportunities

Wind energy counter-conducts in Germany: understanding a new wave of socio-environmental grassroots protest

Unconventional and Emerging Approaches to CO2 Reduction

Perception spillover from fracking onto public perceptions of novel energy technologies

The dynamics of municipal contestation: responses from local government to perceived policy threats from higher authorities