Abstract:Using a two-player common pool resource game, we investigated the influence of multiple factors on cooperation: (1) probability of future rounds, (2) visibility of other participants, (3) biophilia, (4) future discounting, and (5) life history. In each round, participants simultaneously and independently (without conferring) decided how much of the common pool to consume. Participants ( n = 116) were informed that the shared resource would be fully replenished in the next round—but only if—both players together consumed ≤ 50% of the common pool in the current round. Additionally, participants were told the probability (0–100%) of further rounds of play with the same player (this probability was not real; it was purely to manipulate the player's expectations). To assess the effect of the probability of future rounds, we developed a mathematical model to predict the threshold that would permit a Nash Equilibrium of Conditional Cooperation (CC). To manipulate visibility, half the pairs were tested in the same room (seen condition) and half in separate rooms (unseen condition). To measure biophilia, the "Nature Relatedness" (NR) scale was used. To measure future discounting, the "consideration of future consequences" (CFC) scale was used. To measure life history, the participant's UK postcode was obtained (indicating possible residence in a deprived neighbourhood). Participants in our study were not paid. In our results, there was a significant effect showing more cooperation in the visible than not visible condition, but no significant effects of NR, CFC, nor postcodes (but NR was significant in interaction with visibility). For predictability of future rounds, we found a number of significant effects using different tests. A notable result was that there was significantly more CC when the probability of future rounds was ≥ 69% (congruent with one of our model predictions).

Cooperation and Trust in Japanese and British Samples: Evidence From Incomplete Information Games

Commitment-enhancing tools in Centipede games: Evidencing European–Japanese differences in trust and cooperation

Social Value Induction and Cooperation in the Centipede Game

Cooperators Pay More Attention to the Outcome of Mutual Cooperation in the One-Shot Prisoner’s Dilemma Game: Empirical Evidence From an Eye-Tracking Study

Exploring the Cognitive Capacities of Japanese Macaques in a Cooperation Game

Cooperation under Incomplete Information on the Discount Factors

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Impact of Social Preferences, Trust and Behavioural Norms on Cooperation: Experimental Evidence from Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

An Exploration of Cooperation During an Asymmetric Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Reciprocal Altruism-based Cooperation in a Social Network Game

Is a PD game still a dilemma for Japanese rural villagers? A field and laboratory comparison of the impact of social group membership on cooperation

Averting Depletion in a Two-Player Common Pool Resource Game: Being Seen, the Expectation of Future Encounters, and Biophilia Play a Role in Cooperation

Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner's Dilemma Depends on Players' Contributions.

Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments

Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games

Cooperate or aggress? An opponent's tendency to cooperate modulates the neural dynamics of interpersonal cooperation

Behavioural strategies in simultaneous and alternating prisoner's dilemma games with/without voluntary participation

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?

Selfish learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Cooperation and self-regulation in a model of agents playing different games