Abstract:Using a two-player common pool resource game, we investigated the influence of multiple factors on cooperation: (1) probability of future rounds, (2) visibility of other participants, (3) biophilia, (4) future discounting, and (5) life history. In each round, participants simultaneously and independently (without conferring) decided how much of the common pool to consume. Participants ( n = 116) were informed that the shared resource would be fully replenished in the next round—but only if—both players together consumed ≤ 50% of the common pool in the current round. Additionally, participants were told the probability (0–100%) of further rounds of play with the same player (this probability was not real; it was purely to manipulate the player's expectations). To assess the effect of the probability of future rounds, we developed a mathematical model to predict the threshold that would permit a Nash Equilibrium of Conditional Cooperation (CC). To manipulate visibility, half the pairs were tested in the same room (seen condition) and half in separate rooms (unseen condition). To measure biophilia, the "Nature Relatedness" (NR) scale was used. To measure future discounting, the "consideration of future consequences" (CFC) scale was used. To measure life history, the participant's UK postcode was obtained (indicating possible residence in a deprived neighbourhood). Participants in our study were not paid. In our results, there was a significant effect showing more cooperation in the visible than not visible condition, but no significant effects of NR, CFC, nor postcodes (but NR was significant in interaction with visibility). For predictability of future rounds, we found a number of significant effects using different tests. A notable result was that there was significantly more CC when the probability of future rounds was ≥ 69% (congruent with one of our model predictions).

Commitment-enhancing tools in Centipede games: Evidencing European–Japanese differences in trust and cooperation

Cooperation and Trust in Japanese and British Samples: Evidence From Incomplete Information Games

Social Value Induction and Cooperation in the Centipede Game

Committing to Interdependence: Implications from Game Theory for Human-Robot Trust

Stochastic Evolutionary Dynamics of Trust Games with Asymmetric Parameters

The N-Player Trust Game and its Replicator Dynamics

Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies

To Trust or Not to Trust: Evolutionary Dynamics of an Asymmetric N-player Trust Game

Evolution of commitment in the spatial public goods game through institutional incentives

Impact of Social Preferences, Trust and Behavioural Norms on Cooperation: Experimental Evidence from Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

To Be a Truster or Not to Be: Evolutionary Dynamics of a Symmetric N-Player Trust Game in Well-Mixed and Networked Populations

A Model of Risk and Mental State Shifts during Social Interaction

It takes two: examining the dynamic nature of cooperative behavior in adolescents

Averting Depletion in a Two-Player Common Pool Resource Game: Being Seen, the Expectation of Future Encounters, and Biophilia Play a Role in Cooperation

Exploring the Cognitive Capacities of Japanese Macaques in a Cooperation Game

Cognitive strategies take advantage of the cooperative potential of heterogeneous networks

An Exploration of Cooperation During an Asymmetric Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Is a PD game still a dilemma for Japanese rural villagers? A field and laboratory comparison of the impact of social group membership on cooperation

Long-term evidence on cooperation and cultural differences in public goods dilemmas