Abstract:Exploring the conditions under which cooperation can emerge in populations has long been a subject for humans. Fair preference psychology has been incorporated into the analytical framework of the public goods game. Based on considering the dynamic update of trust-driven investment willingness, we introduce a dynamic payoff allocation mechanism and loners to traditional PGG, explaining how the mechanism related to fairness preferences promotes cooperation. We assume that payoffs are equally allocated among players when the payoffs do not exceed the threshold. Otherwise, the excess portion is proportionally allocated according to the investment willingness of cooperators. The effects of parameter changes on the evolution of cooperation are investigated by conducting Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that introducing dynamic payoff allocation and loners can effectively promote cooperation in a specific range of parameters. Specifically, the existence of loners is a double-edged sword. Loners can prevent players from adopting defection behaviors on a large scale when the payoff of cooperation is unsatisfied and inhibit the emergence and diffusion of cooperative strategies as the payoff of cooperators increases. When the payoff of cooperation is dissatisfactory, the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism can promote the average investment willingness of cooperators to accelerate the spread of cooperation. However, the payoff reallocation coefficient should not be set too high, and a high-level threshold of payoff reallocation may lead to the failure of the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism. There is an optimal payoff reallocation coefficient to maximize the efficiency of the proposed mechanism. Moreover, the optimal payoff reallocation coefficient that can maximize the cooperation level is distinct for the diverse combination of enhancement factor and loss aversion coefficient. However, its value should be set at a low level in general. These results may help researchers better understand the evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation from a fairness preference perspective.

Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Selfish learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Cooperation and confusion in public goods games: confusion cannot explain contribution patterns

Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games

Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Rule-Inequality-Aversion Preference and Conditional Cooperation in Public Goods Experiments: Economic Experiment Evidence from China

Social preferences and the variability of conditional cooperation

Are teams conditionally cooperative? Experimental evidence from a public goods game

Position uncertainty in a sequential public goods game: an experiment

The Strategy Method Risks Conflating Confusion with a Social Preference for Conditional Cooperation in Public Goods Games

Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner's Dilemma Depends on Players' Contributions.

Translucent Players: Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Social Dilemmas

Cooperation and self-regulation in a model of agents playing different games

The restart effect in social dilemmas shows humans are self-interested not altruistic

Equality and efficiency shape cooperation in multiple-public-goods provision problems.

A preference to learn from successful rather than common behaviours in human social dilemmas

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation: A fairness preference perspective