Abstract:Why do individuals pay costs to punish selfish behavior, even as third-party observers? A large body of research suggests that reputation plays an important role in motivating such third-party punishment (TPP). Here we focus on a recently proposed reputation-based account (Jordan et al., 2016) that invokes costly signaling. This account proposed that “trustworthy type” individuals (who are incentivized to cooperate with others) typically experience lower costs of TPP, and thus that TPP can function as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Specifically, it was argued that some but not all individuals face incentives to cooperate, making them high-quality and trustworthy interaction partners; and, because the same mechanisms that incentivize cooperation also create benefits for using TPP to deter selfish behavior, these individuals are likely to experience reduced costs of punishing selfishness. Here, we extend this conceptual framework by providing a concrete, “from-the-ground-up” model demonstrating how this process could work in the context of repeated interactions incentivizing both cooperation and punishment. We show how individual differences in the probability of future interaction can create types that vary in whether they find cooperation payoff-maximizing (and thus make high-quality partners), as well as in their net costs of TPP – because a higher continuation probability increases the likelihood of receiving rewards from the victim of the punished transgression (thus offsetting the cost of punishing). We also provide a simple model of dispersal that demonstrates how types that vary in their continuation probabilities can stably coexist, because the payoff from remaining in one’s local environment (i.e. not dispersing) decreases with the number of others who stay. Together, this model demonstrates, from the group up, how TPP can serve as a costly signal of trustworthiness arising from exposure to repeated interactions.

Optimal Non-Prosecution Agreements and the Reputational Effects of Convictions

The Pretrial Agreement System of American Corporate Crime in the Perspective of Constitutionalism:Reviewing the Stein Case

Consequentialist Motives for Punishment Signal Trustworthiness

Jobs and Punishment: Public Opinion on Leniency for White-Collar Crime

Corporate Governance Regulation Through Non-Prosecution

Plea-Bargaining Law: the Impact of Innocence, Trial Penalty, and Conviction Probability on Plea Outcomes

Do prosecutors induce the innocent to plead guilty?

Prosecution Deferred, Prosecution Exempt: On the Interests of (In)Justice in the Non-Trial Resolution of Transnational Corporate Bribery

Optimal Regulatory Enforcement

The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance: Evidence from 1993-2013

The Unintended Consequences of Using “Posers” in Nonprofit Public Service Announcements and Proposed Self-Regulatory Disclosure Solutions

The Dialectics of Corporate Deterrence

Third-Party Punishment as a Costly Signal of High Continuation Probabilities in Repeated Games

Reputation as insurance: how reputation moderates public backlash following a company's decision to profiteer

Reputation Effect on Contract Choice and Self-Enforcement: A Case Study of Farmland Transfer in China

How acceptable is optimal deterrence?

Crime Aggregation, Deterrence, and Witness Credibility

Ex-post Individually Rational Bayesian Persuasion

Plea bargaining when juror effort is costly

Costly punishment sustains indirect reciprocity under low defection detectability

Nudging law enforcement: evidence from low priority initiatives