Abstract:Objectives: To date, most research on plea bargaining has used some form of the shadow of the trial (SOT) model to frame defendant decisions. In this research, we proposed and tested a new conceptual model of plea decision-making, based on fuzzy-trace theory (FTT), for the context in which a nondetained, guilty defendant chooses between a guilty plea or trial, where both the plea and potential trial sentence entail incarceration. Hypotheses: We predicted that plea decisions would be affected by (a) meaningful, categorical changes in conviction probability (e.g., low to moderate, moderate to high), as opposed to more granular changes within categories and (b) the presence and magnitude of categorical distinctions between plea offer and potential trial sentence rather than fine-grained differences between individual offers. Method: We conducted three vignette-based experiments (Study 1: N = 1,701, Study 2: N = 1,098, Study 3: N = 1,232), using Mechanical Turk participants. In Studies 1 and 2, we manipulated potential trial sentence and conviction probability, asking participants to indicate either the maximum plea sentence they would accept (Study 1) or whether they would plead guilty to a specific offer (Study 2). In Study 3, we manipulated plea discount and potential trial sentence and measured plea acceptance. Results: Maximum acceptable plea sentences were similar within and different between "groupings" of meaningfully similar conviction probabilities (Study 1). Plea rates were similar within and different between groupings that comprised plea offers of similarly meaningful distance from the potential trial sentence (Study 3). The results also provide insight into the plea rates that might be expected under different combinations of the independent variables (Studies 2 and 3). Conclusions: These results support a new conceptual model of plea decision-making that may be better suited to explaining case-level differences in plea outcomes than the SOT model and suggest that future research extending this model to a wider range of contexts would be fruitful. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Do prosecutors induce the innocent to plead guilty?

Plea-Bargaining Law: the Impact of Innocence, Trial Penalty, and Conviction Probability on Plea Outcomes

Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas.

The Pretrial Agreement System of American Corporate Crime in the Perspective of Constitutionalism:Reviewing the Stein Case

Plea bargaining when juror effort is costly

Plea bargaining as a human rights question

Developing a model of guilty plea decision-making: Fuzzy-trace theory, gist, and categorical boundaries.

Race, Culpability, and Defendant Plea-Bargaining Decisions: An Experimental Simulation

To Waive or Not to Waive: The Right to Trial and Plea Bargaining

Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond

Optimal Non-Prosecution Agreements and the Reputational Effects of Convictions

Plea Bargain:History and Present

False confessions

Virginia Alford plea-takers experience harsher outcomes than traditional plea-takers.

On Prisoner's Dilemma and Game of Plea in Criminal Proceedings——In the View of the Plea Bargain

An Unjust Bargain: Plea Bargains and Waiver of the Right to Appeal

The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining

Why confessions trump innocence.

Judicial Settlement Conferences and Defendant Plea Decision-Making

Conviction by Consent? Vulnerability, Autonomy and Conviction by Guilty Plea

The effect of confession evidence on conviction, and considering alternative scenarios as remedy in a sample of police officers