Abstract:Why do individuals pay costs to punish selfish behavior, even as third-party observers? A large body of research suggests that reputation plays an important role in motivating such third-party punishment (TPP). Here we focus on a recently proposed reputation-based account (Jordan et al., 2016) that invokes costly signaling. This account proposed that “trustworthy type” individuals (who are incentivized to cooperate with others) typically experience lower costs of TPP, and thus that TPP can function as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Specifically, it was argued that some but not all individuals face incentives to cooperate, making them high-quality and trustworthy interaction partners; and, because the same mechanisms that incentivize cooperation also create benefits for using TPP to deter selfish behavior, these individuals are likely to experience reduced costs of punishing selfishness. Here, we extend this conceptual framework by providing a concrete, “from-the-ground-up” model demonstrating how this process could work in the context of repeated interactions incentivizing both cooperation and punishment. We show how individual differences in the probability of future interaction can create types that vary in whether they find cooperation payoff-maximizing (and thus make high-quality partners), as well as in their net costs of TPP – because a higher continuation probability increases the likelihood of receiving rewards from the victim of the punished transgression (thus offsetting the cost of punishing). We also provide a simple model of dispersal that demonstrates how types that vary in their continuation probabilities can stably coexist, because the payoff from remaining in one’s local environment (i.e. not dispersing) decreases with the number of others who stay. Together, this model demonstrates, from the group up, how TPP can serve as a costly signal of trustworthiness arising from exposure to repeated interactions.

Consequentialist Motives for Punishment Signal Trustworthiness

Severity and deservedness determine signalled trustworthiness in third party punishment

Calculated Punishment

Moral recognition for workplace offenses underlies the punitive responses of managers: A functional theoretical approach to morality and punishment

Third-Party Punishment as a Costly Signal of High Continuation Probabilities in Repeated Games

Asymmetrical effects of reward and punishment on attributions of morality

Third-Party Punishment or Compensation? It Depends on the Reputational Benefits

Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness

The Effects of Punishment Impacting on Social Trust and Cooperation:Controversy and Interpretation

Aligning with the Agent of Justice: Schadenfreude Following Punishment of Trust Violators

Combining Reputation And Punishment To Promote Cooperation

The source of punishment matters: Third-party punishment restrains observers from selfish behaviors better than does second-party punishment by shaping norm perceptions

Human Punishment Behavior

Self-serving reward and punishment: evidence from the laboratory

Both Loved and Feared: Third Party Punishers Are Viewed as Formidable and Likeable, but These Reputational Benefits May Only Be Open to Dominant Individuals

Conditional Punishment: Descriptive Social Norms Drive Negative Reciprocity

Sympathy with resentment: Willingness to report criminal behavior depends on the punishment

Is a punisher always trustworthy? In-group punishment reduces trust

Reputation and Punishment sustain cooperation in the Optional Public Goods Game

Strategic Exploitation by Higher-Status People Incurs Harsher Third-Party Punishment

Gossip Versus Punishment: The Efficiency of Reputation to Promote and Maintain Cooperation