Abstract:Punishment is fundamental to the evolution of cooperative norms in organizations and societies, yet little is known about the decision processes that underlie it. Based on findings that people are faster when punishing (relative to when withholding punishment), scholars proposed that humans have an intuitive inclination to punish, where withholding punishment involves deliberation. Here, we report a public goods game (PGG) experiment that tests the generality of this dual-process hypothesis, and propose an alternative single-process theory of punishment decisions. By experimentally manipulating the cost and impact of punishment across the game, we show that punishment response times (RTs) are sensitive to cost-benefit tradeoffs, where participants are sometimes relatively slow to punish. The patterns in our data are at odds with the dual-process account of punishment RTs, yet confirm two key predictions of single-process sequential sampling models (SSMs): an inverted-U-shaped relationship between RTs and the strength of preferences for punishing, and a positive association between punishment rates and the relative speed of punishment across individuals. We further explore the utility of modelling punishment via SSMs in a computational analysis using the drift-diffusion model (DDM), and find that the model successfully incorporates choice and RT data to improve out-of-sample prediction of punishment behavior, compared to computationally naïve models. We conclude that punishment behavior arises from a value-computation process that shares a common mechanism with decisions in other domains, where the DDM provides a unified single-process framework for studying the micro-foundations of punishment and allows generating behavioral predictions using process measures.

Combining Reputation And Punishment To Promote Cooperation

Information disclosing and cooperation in public goods game with punishment

Calculated Punishment

The Role of Reputation to Reduce Punishment Costs in Spatial Public Goods Game

Gossip Versus Punishment: The Efficiency of Reputation to Promote and Maintain Cooperation

Endogenous Combination of Reward and Punishment Promotes Cooperation

Reputation-based Probabilistic Punishment on the Evolution of Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game

The evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game with tolerant punishment based on reputation threshold

Impact of reputation-based switching strategy between punishment and social exclusion on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game

Conditional Cooperator Enhances Institutional Punishment in Public Goods Game.

Reputation and Punishment sustain cooperation in the Optional Public Goods Game

Research on Differences of Punishment and Reward: Evidence from Public Goods Experiments in the Stranger Condition

Punishment mechanisms and cooperation in public goods games: Experimental evidence

Endogenous rewards promote cooperation

Costly Punishment Does Not Always Increase Cooperation

Cooperation dynamics in spatial public goods games with graded punishment mechanism

The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment

Conditional punishment is a double-edged sword in promoting cooperation.

The regulation of good and evi promotes cooperation in public goods game

If Cooperation is Likely Punish Mildly: Insights from Economic Experiments Based on the Snowdrift Game.

F eb 2 01 8 Promoting cooperation by punishing minority