Abstract:Peer punishment is regarded as an important element in sustaining human cooperation for public good provision. Many behavioral experiments have shown that public good provision is higher if cooperation norms can be enforced by peer punishment. However, these experiments predominantly focus on single-group public goods, in which people have to choose between their private interests and the interests of their group. In many societal problems, people are involved in multilevel public goods problems, where multiple local groups are nested within a larger global group. We study experimentally how punishment affects cooperation and norms in multilevel public goods games. In our games, two local groups are nested within a larger global group. Participants have to choose between not contributing, contributing locally, and contributing globally. Local contributions would lead to a polarized outcome where two separate local public goods are provided, whereas global contributions would lead to a unified global good that benefits all. Moreover, we study whether cooperation and punishment patterns depend on the type of public good participants are initially exposed to: single-group or multilevel. Participants either begin in a single-group public goods game and then shift to a multilevel public goods game or vice versa. We find that punishment is less effective in multilevel public goods games than in single-group public goods games. In particular, punishment only promotes cooperation in multilevel public goods games if people have prior experience with solving single-group public goods games. Our results refine the boundary conditions for the effectiveness of punishment and suggest that 'starting small' by first solving single-group public goods problems is necessary for successful multilevel public good provision.

Punishment mechanisms and cooperation in public goods games: Experimental evidence

Calculated Punishment

Promoting cooperation by punishing minority

Cooperation dynamics in spatial public goods games with graded punishment mechanism

Cooperation, punishment, and group change in multilevel public goods experiments

Research on Differences of Punishment and Reward: Evidence from Public Goods Experiments in the Stranger Condition

Different punishment systems in a public goods game with asymmetric endowments

Effects of punishment driven by inequity aversion on promoting cooperation in public goods games

Combining Reputation And Punishment To Promote Cooperation

Group Size, Coordination, and the Effectiveness of Punishment in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism: an Experimental Investigation

The role of punishment in the spatial public goods game

Bonus-based mercenary punishment promotes cooperation in public goods games

Conditional punishment is a double-edged sword in promoting cooperation.

The effect of distribution of fines on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game

Endogenous Combination of Reward and Punishment Promotes Cooperation

Punishment as a Means of Competition: Implications for Strong Reciprocity Theory

Information disclosing and cooperation in public goods game with punishment

Conditional Punishment: Descriptive Social Norms Drive Negative Reciprocity

Punishing Just in Time: Public Cooperation and Economies of Scale

Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game

Rare but Severe Concerted Punishment That Favors Cooperation.