Research on Differences of Punishment and Reward: Evidence from Public Goods Experiments in the Stranger Condition

Xu Bin,Fan Liangcong,Cheng Qiqi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1555450

2009-01-01

Abstract:This paper examines the differences of two alternative decentralized selective incentives, punishment and reward, in the condition of random-matched public goods experiments. We also provide a robust analysis by varying the effectiveness of punishment(reward), that is the amount by which a punishment(reward) point reduces(increases) the recipient’s earning. Results show that, (1) with regard to consequences, a “paradox of punishment and reward on cooperation and welfare” exists in most symmetric peer effectiveness structure at the overall level; namely, average contributions along with punishment significantly outweigh those along with reward, but average earnings in the former treatments are significantly higher than those in the latter. And at the individual level, the approach of how punishment/reward works is different; (2) regarding actions of punishment and reward themselves, individual prefers to punish than reward in most symmetric effectiveness structure both at the overall and individual level; (3) considering response of actions of punishment/reward to normal norms underlined them, holding constant the size of the contribution deviation of the individual who is punished/rewarded to that of who impose, negative deviation leads to higher punishments than rewards for positive deviation.