Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how and when a reputation for corporate social responsibility (CSR) can deter dysfunctional consumer behaviors (DCBs) such as shoplifting or negative word-of-mouth (WOM) in response to firm failures. The authors predict that congruency of the CSR activities and the basis for the firm failure (e.g. environmental protection, environmental harm) provides protection for firms while incongruency (e.g. environmental protection, social harm) does not. The authors base this prediction on the process of retroactive attribution and sense-making. Design/methodology/approach Across two studies the research finds support that a reputation for CSR can deter consumer dysfunctional behavior. Study 1 uses an experimental design with a Mturk sample, and a behavioral outcome using an overpayment situation, to examine when consumers will act honestly and recognize overpayment. Study 2 uses secondary data, across three novel data sources (Google trends data, an existing data set of consumer perceptions of CSR and Factiva to uncover press coverage of negative firm events). Study 2 examines how CSR reputation impacts consumers’ participation in negative WOM in response to firm failures. Findings Study 1 finds support for CSR congruency as a protection mechanism against dysfunctional behavior in response to negative events. The authors find that dysfunctional behaviors in conditions of congruency, while incongruent and a control condition do not provide such protections. Study 2 supports these findings using Google trends data in the form of online negative WOM. The authors find that when firms are known for their social performance, negative events in the social domain result in significantly lower levels of negative WOM. Originality/value The current paper makes the novel prediction that consumers will use a current negative event (corporate social irresponsibility) to re-evaluate previous CSR. Thus, in contrast with prior research, the authors argue that a negative event is not affected by previous CSR but that previous CSR is affected by a negative event. Furthermore, the authors posit that the congruency between the transgression and previous CSR moderates consumer perceptions, such that incongruent CSR and transgression contexts lead to increased DCBs through consumers’ retroactive sense-making process.

The Dialectics of Corporate Deterrence

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

A Meta-Analysis of Deterrence Theory in Information Security Policy Compliance Research

Can corporate social responsibility deter consumer dysfunctional behavior?

Rational Choice, Situated Action, and the Social Control of Organizations

The deterrence effect of M&A regulatory enforcements

A socio‐economic theory of regulatory compliance

Optimal Regulatory Enforcement

A meta-analysis of the deterrence theory in security-compliant and security-risk behaviors

Punish One, Teach a Hundred?A Study on the Failure of the Indirect Deterrence Effects of Regulatory Punishments

The Deterrence Effect of a Penalty for Environmental Violation

Corporate Hypocrisy And Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model Of Organizational Identification And Perceived Importance Of Csr

Weak Enforcement, Strong Deterrence: Dialogues with Chinese Lawyers About Tax Evasion and Compliance

Crime, deterrence and punishment revisited

Perceived Formal and Informal Sanctions in Deterring Cybercrime in a College Sample

Can Corporate Ethics Programs Reduce Unethical Behavior? Threat Appraisal or Coping Appraisal

Consequentialist Motives for Punishment Signal Trustworthiness

Corporate Governance Regulation Through Non-Prosecution

Leveraging fairness and reactance theories to deter reactive computer abuse following enhanced organisational information security policies: an empirical study of the influence of counterfactual reasoning and organisational trust

Higher Highs and Lower Lows: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in CEO Dismissal

Neural Responses to Sanction Threats in Two-Party Economic Exchange