Abstract:Green–green dilemmas are particularly challenging since they involve two desirable goals, yet with detrimental counter-effects. Although wind energy production is to some desirable as a form of renewable energy for reducing global CO2 emission, it conflicts with conservation goals when airborne animals die during collisions. Yet, protecting species with high collision risk may prevent to some extent the deployment of wind turbines or involve altered operation schemes with lowered energy production, two constraints impairing the development of wind energy production. Stakeholders involved in wind turbine projects discuss this dilemma not only based on their knowledge and interests, but also on their thoughts and emotions about wind turbines or affected animals such as bats. We studied some of these cognitions and emotions of stakeholders involved in the local realization of wind turbine projects (e.g. planning or authorization) to shed light on fundamental aspects of disagreements. We undertook a self-administered online survey (n=537 respondents) with six stakeholder groups from the wind energy and conservation sector to understand i) their value orientations, beliefs and emotions, the predictive potential of ii) value orientations, beliefs, emotions on trust as well as iii) trust among and in stakeholders involved in decision making processes. We observed that beliefs about the importance of wind turbines and emotions towards wind turbines differed across stakeholders while emotions towards bats were generally positive. Overall, stakeholders had low trust in each other. Representatives from the wind energy sector had more trust in politicians compared to conservationists. Trust was most strongly influenced by beliefs about the importance of wind turbines. Beliefs about the importance of wind turbines were in turn most strongly influenced by emotions towards bats and wind turbines. We argue that awareness of different beliefs and emotions among stakeholders should be acknowledged in this apparent conflict to foster trust among stakeholders.

International experiences with opposition to wind energy siting decisions: lessons for environmental and social appraisal

Place attachment and social barriers to large-scale renewable energy development: a social–ecological systems analysis of a failed wind energy project in the south-central United States

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Wind energy counter-conducts in Germany: understanding a new wave of socio-environmental grassroots protest

Applying Value Sensitive Design (VSD) to Wind Turbines and Wind Parks: An Exploration

Winds of change: An engaged ethics approach to energy justice

Quantifying social factors for onshore wind planning – A systematic review

Global Review on Environmental Impacts of Onshore Wind Energy in the Field of Tension between Human Societies and Natural Systems

The politics of Estonia’s offshore wind energy programme: Discourse, power and marine spatial planning

Energy justice: Lessons from offshore wind farm siting conflicts in South Korea

To support or oppose renewable energy projects? A systematic literature review on the factors influencing landscape design and social acceptance

The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma: Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany

Low-carbon but corrupt? Bribery, inappropriateness and unfairness concerns in Danish energy policy

Attitudes toward Wind Power in Norway-Solution or Problem in Renewable Energy Development?

Spatial Trade-Offs in National Land-Based Wind Power Production in Times of Biodiversity and Climate Crises

Conditions for just offshore wind energy: Addressing the societal challenges of the North Sea wind industry

Is local opposition taking the wind out of the energy transition?

Investigating Avian habitat modification and behavioral dynamics in active wind farm environments

Cautious but Committed: Moving Toward Adaptive Planning and Operation Strategies for Renewable Energy’s Wildlife Implications

International Assessment of Priority Environmental Issues for Land-Based and Offshore Wind Energy Development

Renewables but unjust? Critical restoration geography as a framework for addressing global renewable energy injustice