Abstract:While carbon pricing is widely seen as a crucial element of climate policy and has been implemented in many countries, it also has met with strong resistance. We provide a comprehensive overview of public perceptions of the fairness of carbon pricing and how these affect policy acceptability. To this end, we review evidence from empirical studies on how individuals judge personal, distributional and procedural aspects of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade. In addition, we examine preferences for particular redistributive and other uses of revenues generated by carbon pricing and their role in instrument acceptability. Our results indicate a high concern over distributional effects, particularly in relation to policy impacts on poor people, in turn reducing policy acceptability. In addition, people show little trust in the capacities of governments to put the revenues of carbon pricing to good use. Somewhat surprisingly, most studies do not indicate clear public preferences for using revenues to ensure fairer policy outcomes, notably by reducing its regressive effects. Instead, many people prefer using revenues for 'environmental projects' of various kinds. We end by providing recommendations for improving public acceptability of carbon pricing. One suggestion to increase policy acceptability is combining the redistribution of revenue to vulnerable groups with the funding for environmental projects, such as on renewable energy.Key policy insights If people perceive carbon pricing instruments as fair, this increases policy acceptability and support.People's satisfaction with information provided by the government about the policy instrument increases acceptability.While people express high concern over uneven distribution of the policy burden, they often prefer using carbon pricing revenues for environmental projects instead of compensation for inequitable outcomes.Recent studies find that people's preferences shift to using revenues for making policy fairer if they better understand the functioning of carbon pricing, notably that relatively high prices of CO2-intensive goods and services reduce their consumption.Combining the redistribution of revenue to support both vulnerable groups and environmental projects, such as on renewable energy, seems to most increase policy acceptability.

Low-carbon but corrupt? Bribery, inappropriateness and unfairness concerns in Danish energy policy

International experiences with opposition to wind energy siting decisions: lessons for environmental and social appraisal

How can financial incentives promote local ownership of onshore wind and solar projects? Case study evidence from Germany, Denmark, the UK and Ontario

Community Acceptance of Wind Energy Developments: Experience from Wind Energy Scarce Regions in Europe

Clean, low-carbon but corrupt? Examining corruption risks and solutions for the renewable energy sector in Mexico, Malaysia, Kenya and South Africa

Revealing hidden injustice: Barriers to citizen participation among migrants in the energy transition of The Hague

Attitudes toward Wind Power in Norway-Solution or Problem in Renewable Energy Development?

Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature

‘We like sharing energy but currently there's no advantage’: Transformative opportunities and challenges of local energy communities in Europe

Swedish wind power expansion: Conflicting responsibilities between state and municipalities

Institutional constellations and policy instruments for offshore wind power around the North sea

Place attachment and social barriers to large-scale renewable energy development: a social–ecological systems analysis of a failed wind energy project in the south-central United States

Copenhagen's West End a ‘Paradise Lost’: The Political Production of Territorial Stigmatization in Denmark

Conditions for just offshore wind energy: Addressing the societal challenges of the North Sea wind industry

Efficient Renewable Electricity Support: Designing an Incentive-compatible Support Scheme

Wind Turbine Shutdowns and Upgrades in Denmark: Timing Decisions and the Impact of Government Policy

Winds of change: An engaged ethics approach to energy justice

Contested representations of benefits of urban nature in a densifying marginalised neighbourhood

The politics of Estonia’s offshore wind energy programme: Discourse, power and marine spatial planning

Community involvement in mixed-income transformation in Copenhagen, Denmark

Corruption and Unethical Behavior: Report on a Set of Danish Guidelines