Abstract:BackgroundF18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET) reconstruction algorithms can have substantial influence on quantitative image data used, e.g., for therapy planning or monitoring in oncology. We analyzed radial activity concentration profiles of differently reconstructed FDG-PET images to determine the influence of varying signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) on the respective spatial resolution, activity concentration distribution, and quantification (standardized uptake value [SUV], metabolic tumor volume [MTV]).MethodsMeasurements were performed on a Siemens Biograph mCT 64 using a cylindrical phantom containing four spheres (diameter, 30 to 70 mm) filled with F18-FDG applying three SBRs (SBR1, 16:1; SBR2, 6:1; SBR3, 2:1). Images were reconstructed employing six algorithms (filtered backprojection [FBP], FBP + time-of-flight analysis [FBP + TOF], 3D-ordered subset expectation maximization [3D-OSEM], 3D-OSEM + TOF, point spread function [PSF], PSF + TOF). Spatial resolution was determined by fitting the convolution of the object geometry with a Gaussian point spread function to radial activity concentration profiles. MTV delineation was performed using fixed thresholds and semiautomatic background-adapted thresholding (ROVER, ABX, Radeberg, Germany).ResultsThe pairwise Wilcoxon test revealed significantly higher spatial resolutions for PSF + TOF (up to 4.0 mm) compared to PSF, FBP, FBP + TOF, 3D-OSEM, and 3D-OSEM + TOF at all SBRs (each P < 0.05) with the highest differences for SBR1 decreasing to the lowest for SBR3. Edge elevations in radial activity profiles (Gibbs artifacts) were highest for PSF and PSF + TOF declining with decreasing SBR (PSF + TOF largest sphere; SBR1, 6.3%; SBR3, 2.7%). These artifacts induce substantial SUVmax overestimation compared to the reference SUV for PSF algorithms at SBR1 and SBR2 leading to substantial MTV underestimation in threshold-based segmentation. In contrast, both PSF algorithms provided the lowest deviation of SUVmean from reference SUV at SBR1 and SBR2.ConclusionsAt high contrast, the PSF algorithms provided the highest spatial resolution and lowest SUVmean deviation from the reference SUV. In contrast, both algorithms showed the highest deviations in SUVmax and threshold-based MTV definition. At low contrast, all investigated reconstruction algorithms performed approximately equally. The use of PSF algorithms for quantitative PET data, e.g., for target volume definition or in serial PET studies, should be performed with caution - especially if comparing SUV of lesions with high and low contrasts.

Impact of quantitative index derived from 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT on reconstruction with correction methods evaluated using a 3D-striatum digital brain phantom

Optimization of the reconstruction parameters in [123I]FP-CIT SPECT

Comparison of the ability of different quantitative indices in 123I-FP-CIT single-photon emission computed tomography to differentiate dopaminergic neurodegenerative disease

An Evaluation of SPECT Imaging for Quantitative Assessment of Parkinson's Disease

The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction

Solving Outside-Axial-Field-Of-View Scatter Correction Problem in Pet Via Digital Experimentation

Effects of the Different PET Image Reconstruction Methods on Distribution of Dopamine Transporter in Healthy Human Brain

Convolutional neural network based attenuation correction for 123 I-FP-CIT SPECT with focused striatum imaging

An Effective Scatter Correction Method Based on Single Scatter Simulation for A 3d Whole-Body Pet Scanner

Optimization of reconstruction in quantitative brain PET images: Benefits from PSF modeling and correction of edge artifacts

Semi-quantitative analysis of visually normal 123I-FP-CIT across three large databases revealed no difference between control and patients

Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System

Accurate Automated Quantification of Dopamine Transporter PET Without MRI Using Deep Learning-based Spatial Normalization

Noninvasive quantification of [18F]SynVesT-1 binding using simplified reference tissue model 2

The influence of partial volume effect on the measurement of lesion to background ratio in standard SPECT and coincidence circuit SPECT: a phantom study

A projection-domain low-count quantitative SPECT method for alpha-particle emitting radiopharmaceutical therapy

Image reconstruction parameters and the standardized uptake value ratios in brain amyloid PET

Determination of Accuracy and Precision of Lesion Uptake Measurements in Human Subjects with Time-of-Flight PET

The impact of different reconstruction parameters on quantitative 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT values in the assessment of cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis

Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system

New quantitative indices of cardiac amyloidosis with 99mTc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy