Abstract:2609 Objectives To systematically study the effect of Time of Flight (TOF) and Point Spread Function (PSF) reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of integrated PET/MR. Methods All phantom measurements were performed on an integrated PET/MR (GE SIGNA PET/MR and AW4.6 workstation). The NEMA IQ phantom was filled with water and a total activity of 4.14mCi (1.53×108Bq) of 18F-FDG. The sphere-to-background activity concentration ratio was 4:1. The phantom was kept aside for 260 minutes before scan. At the beginning of scan, the activity concentration of the 4 hot spheres was 0.32μCi/cc (1.18×104Bq/ml). Multiple PET data blocks were acquired in LIST MODEL and the scan time was 11 minutes. MRAC was used for attenuation correction. The respective PET images were reconstructed with the following parameters: sinogram of 11 min in duration, 28 subsets, 192×192 image matrix size. Different reconstruction algorithms (TOF + PSF,non TOF + PSF,TOF + non PSF and non TOF + non PSF) were used. And different iterations (2, 3, and 4) were used for TOF + PSF algorithm to study its effect on image quality. The obtained PET images were quantitatively evaluated following the NEMA IQ protocol, investigating contrast recovery (CR), background variability (BV), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of hot spheres, and the residual error in attenuation and scatter corrections. Results By visual judgments, there was hot artifact in the lung area of the phantom images reconstructed by non TOF. TOF eliminates this hot artifact significantly. For reconstruction algorithms quantitative evaluation, the results of non TOF + non PSF were used as reference. CR of hot spheres increased 20.94% when TOF was used alone, 7.61% when PSF was used alone, and 40.17% when TOF and PSF were used in combination. CR of cold spheres increased 11.29% with TOF alone and 12.32% with TOF + PSF. PSF alone almost did not affect the CR of cold spheres. The average residual error in attenuation and scatter corrections decreased 91.90% with TOF. The average BV for hot spheres decreased 16.20% with TOF alone, 3.44% with PSF alone, and 27.19% with TOF + PSF. The average BV for cold spheres decreased 31.90% with TOF alone and 35.70% with TOF + PSF. The SNR increased 44.28% with TOF alone, 11.52% with PSF alone, and 92.70% with TOF + PSF. For number of iterations evaluation, images were reconstructed by TOF + PSF. The average CR and the average BV of spheres increased with increasing iterations. The average residual error in attenuation and scatter corrections decreased with decreasing iterations. The SNR decreased with increasing iterations. Conclusions The phantom study results show that TOF eliminates hot artifact in lung area significantly. This conclusion reminds valid in patient images. Both TOF and PSF can improve the overall image quality, especially when they are used in combination. TOF has been the essential technique for eliminating interference between PET and MRI, achieving synchronous scan, and improving the PET image quality.

Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system

Feasibility of noise-reduction reconstruction technology based on non-local-mean principle in SiPM-PET/CT

The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction

Optimization of the Algorithm for the Implementation of Point Spread Function in the 3D-OSEM Reconstruction Algorithm Based on the List-Mode Micro PET Data

Head-to-head comparison of a Si-photomultiplier-based and a conventional photomultiplier-based PET-CT system

Improvement in PET/CT Image Quality with a Combination of Point-Spread Function and Time-of-Flight in Relation to Reconstruction Parameters

Evaluating the Impact of Different Positron Emitters on the Performance of a Clinical PET/MR System.

Performance evaluation of a PET/MR scanner with multiple positron-emitting radionuclides

Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF)

Optimization of reconstruction in quantitative brain PET images: Benefits from PSF modeling and correction of edge artifacts

Imaging performance evaluation in depth of interaction PET with a new method of sinogram generation: A Monte Carlo simulation study

Quantitative evaluation of PSMA PET imaging using a realistic anthropomorphic phantom and shell-less radioactive epoxy lesions

Head-to-head comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride coronary PET imaging between a silicon photomultiplier with digital photon counting and conventional scanners

Point-spread function reconstructed PET images of sub-centimeter lesions are not quantitative

Performance evaluation of iterative PET reconstruction with resolution recovery incorporating Gallium‐68 positron range correction

The Effect of TOF Technology on PET Image Quality of Integrated PET/MR Equipment

Image quality evaluation for a clinical organ-targeted PET camera

Performance evaluation of a high-resolution brain PET scanner using four-layer MPPC DOI detectors

Implementation of a Spatially-Variant and Tissue-Dependent Positron Range Correction for PET/CT Imaging

Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems

Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system