Abstract:138 Introduction: Although most PET/MR imaging studies are conducted using 18F, other positron-emitting radionuclides, such as 64Cu, 68Ga, 89Zr and 124I are also popular options, and the availability of them in clinical settings is boosting. These radionuclides, especially the non-pure positron emitters, differ from 18F in several aspects, including half life, positron energy, positron range, positron branching ratio and gamma emission profile. All these impact on the signal acquisition and imaging quality of the PET/MR scanner. In this study, we characterize the performance of the UIH PET/MR scanner with multiple positron-emitting radionuclides to verify the imaging ability of the system.\n Methods: The PET/MR scanner was a United Imaging Healthcare uPMR 790 HD TOF PET/MR, with a field strength of 3.0 T. [18F]FDG was produced with the medical cyclotron, [68Ga]GaCl3 was obtained from a 68Ge/68Ga generator, while [89Zr]Zr-oxalate and [124I]NaI were manufactured through solid target irradiation and subsequent purification steps. Evaluation methods were developed according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard for performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. In the original standard, the types of radionuclides being used to caliber the system were restricted, however, the application was expanded to includes all radionuclides involved for the purpose of this research. The IEC image quality (IQ) phantom was used to validate the imaging ability of the scanner on these radionuclides. The background activity in the phantom was adjusted to around 5.3 kBq/mL in all cases. Point sources were used to calibrate the spatial resolution of the system. The point sources were manufactured by introducing a tiny droplet of concentrated radioactive solution into the capillary tubes. A custom jig was designed to hold the sources to the position as specified by the NEMA standard.\n Results: The reconstructed images of the IQ phantom were obtained for each radionuclide, and subsequent quantification were accordingly performed. The images for all radionuclides retrieves the SUV of lung insert, the cold spheres, the background, and the hot spheres accurately. Due to the robust reconstruction algorithm, prompt gamma emission were well accounted for and the image quality of non-pure gamma emitters 68Ga and 124I are also acceptable. The spatial resolution of these radionuclides was obtained by measuring the corresponding FHWMs of the point source response functions reconstructed by a filtered back projection algorithm.\nConclusion: The PET/MR scanner evaluated showed satisfactory performance with 68Ga, 89Zr and 124I. All radionuclides perform well in terms of the image quality and the spatial resolution. These findings lay a sound foundation for clinical image acquisition.\nAcknowledgements: The work is supported by Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals-Yangfan Project (ZYLX201816).

Evaluation of image quality with four positron emitters and three preclinical PET/CT systems

Performance evaluation of a PET/MR scanner with multiple positron-emitting radionuclides

Evaluating the Impact of Different Positron Emitters on the Performance of a Clinical PET/MR System.

Image quality evaluation for a clinical organ-targeted PET camera

Image Quality with Non-Standard Nuclides in PET.

Quantitative Small Animal Pet Imaging with Nonconventional Nuclides

Measurement and Evaluation of Quantitative Performance of PET/CT Images Before a Multicenter Clinical Trial

Performance of nanoScan PET/CT and PET/MR for quantitative imaging of 18F and 89Zr as compared with ex vivo biodistribution in tumor-bearing mice

Performance evaluation of iterative PET reconstruction with resolution recovery incorporating Gallium‐68 positron range correction

Image quality and detectability in Siemens Biograph PET/MRI and PET/CT systems—a phantom study

Quantitative comparison of PET performance—Siemens Biograph mCT and mMR

Contrast-enhanced small-animal PET/CT in cancer research: strong improvement of diagnostic accuracy without significant alteration of quantitative accuracy and NEMA NU 4–2008 image quality parameters

Phantom-based image quality assessment of clinical 18F-FDG protocols in digital PET/CT and comparison to conventional PMT-based PET/CT

Performance Evaluation of a Rotatory Dual-Head PET System with 90̂increments for Small Animal Imaging

Quantification performance of silicon photomultiplier-based PET for small 18F-, 68Ga- and 124I-avid lesions in the context of radionuclide therapy planning

Performance evaluation of a small‐animal PET scanner with 213 mm axis using NEMA NU 4‐2008

Performance evaluation of a preclinical SPECT/CT system for multi-animal and multi-isotope quantitative experiments

Quantitative analysis of the effect of the magnetic field generated by a PET/MR scanner on positron range

The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction

Evaluation of quantitative accuracy in CZT-based pre-clinical SPECT for various isotopes

Technical Note: Performance evaluation of a small‐animal PET/CT system based on NEMA NU 4–2008 standards