Generation of Synthetic PET Images of Synaptic Density and Amyloid from 18F-FDG Images Using Deep Learning
Rui Wang,Hui Liu,Takuya Toyonaga,Luyao Shi,Jing Wu,John Aaron Onofrey,Yu-Jung Tsai,Mika Naganawa,Tianyu Ma,Yaqiang Liu,Ming-Kai Chen,Adam P. Mecca,Ryan S. O'Dell,Christopher H. van Dyck,Richard E. Carson,Chi Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15073
IF: 4.506
2021-01-01
Medical Physics
Abstract:Purpose Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with various tracers is increasingly used in Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies. However, access to PET scans using new or less-available tracers with sophisticated synthesis and short half-life isotopes may be very limited. Therefore, it is of great significance and interest in AD research to assess the feasibility of generating synthetic PET images of less-available tracers from the PET image of another common tracer, in particular F-18-FDG. Methods We implemented advanced deep learning methods using the U-Net model to predict C-11-UCB-J PET images of synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), a surrogate of synaptic density, from F-18-FDG PET data. Dynamic F-18-FDG and C-11-UCB-J scans were performed in 21 participants with normal cognition (CN) and 33 participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cerebellum was used as the reference region for both tracers. For C-11-UCB-J image prediction, four network models were trained and tested, which included 1) F-18-FDG SUV ratio (SUVR) to C-11-UCB-J SUVR, 2) F-18-FDG K-i ratio to C-11-UCB-J SUVR, 3) F-18-FDG SUVR to C-11-UCB-J distribution volume ratio (DVR), and 4) F-18-FDG K-i ratio to C-11-UCB-J DVR. The normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), structure similarity index (SSIM), and Pearson's correlation coefficient were calculated for evaluating the overall image prediction accuracy. Mean bias of various ROIs in the brain and correlation plots between predicted images and true images were calculated for ROI-based prediction accuracy. Following a similar training and evaluation strategy, F-18-FDG SUVR to C-11-PiB SUVR network was also trained and tested for C-11-PiB static image prediction. Results The results showed that all four network models obtained satisfactory C-11-UCB-J static and parametric images. For C-11-UCB-J SUVR prediction, the mean ROI bias was -0.3% +/- 7.4% for the AD group and -0.5% +/- 7.3% for the CN group with F-18-FDG SUVR as the input, -0.7% +/- 8.1% for the AD group, and -1.3% +/- 7.0% for the CN group with F-18-FDG K-i ratio as the input. For C-11-UCB-J DVR prediction, the mean ROI bias was -1.3% +/- 7.5% for the AD group and -2.0% +/- 6.9% for the CN group with F-18-FDG SUVR as the input, -0.7% +/- 9.0% for the AD group, and -1.7% +/- 7.8% for the CN group with F-18-FDG K-i ratio as the input. For C-11-PiB SUVR image prediction, which appears to be a more challenging task, the incorporation of additional diagnostic information into the network is needed to control the bias below 5% for most ROIs. Conclusions It is feasible to use 3D U-Net-based methods to generate synthetic C-11-UCB-J PET images from F-18-FDG images with reasonable prediction accuracy. It is also possible to predict C-11-PiB SUVR images from F-18-FDG images, though the incorporation of additional non-imaging information is needed.