Abstract:Western theorists have generally construed reward allocation as mainly a rational action by the notion that allocation decision‐making is based solely on people’s justice concern. We argued that reward allocation, as a social act taking place in a specific social‐situational context, is influenced both by some social interactive factors such as the relationship and social interactions between the participants, and by the pervasive social norms governing people’s conduct in a particular society. This study aimed at examining the influence of two such factors, guanxi (equivalent to relationship) and renqing (equivalent to human affect), on Chinese allocation decision‐making under a distributive situation. We hypothesized that Chinese allocators would base their decision not only on their judgment of the participants’ contributions but also on their guanxi with the participant. Specifically, we predicted that the emphasis on guanxi and renqing would be manifested in the Chinese allocator’s employment of the reasonableness norm dictating that both reason (li) and affect (qing) are considered in making allocation decisions. To test this hypothesis, we adopted the scenario approach and asked subjects to hypothetically allocate a reward to one of six guanxi partners. The 228 participants were divided into six groups; in each group they were instructed to do the allocation based on one of the five norms respectively: fairness (he li), renqing, equity (gong zheng), “ought to,” reasonableness (heqinghe li), and to indicate what they “would” allocate. The findings confirmed that the reasonableness norm was the one which subjects adopted in reward allocation. The results were discussed in the context of Chinese culture.

How Should We Distribute Rewards in Social Sustainable Organizations? Investigating Individual Preferences for Justice Allocation Norms

The Development of Children's Preferences for Equality and Equity Across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures.

Chinese Conceptions Of Justice And Reward Allocation

Trade-offs between Group Fairness Metrics in Societal Resource Allocation

Distributive Justice and Higher Education Resource Allocation: Perceptions of Fairness

Distributive Injustice: Leadership Adherence to Social Norm Pressures and the Negative Impact on Organizational Commitment

How do people judge fairness in supervisor and peer relationships? Another assessment of the dimensions of justice

Justice as a Social Bargain and Optimization Problem

Beyond Distributive Justice: the Reasonableness Norm in Chinese Reward Allocation

Fairness Preferences, Actual and Hypothetical: A Study of Crowdworker Incentives

The fairness of human resource management practices: an assessment by the justice sensitive

Fairness, expectations and life satisfaction: evidence from Europe

Fair allocation rules for the commons—informing water policy design through survey methods

Are social justice and sustainability interdependent? If so, how and under what conditions?

Evolution of collective fairness in complex networks through degree-based role assignment

Distributive justice and affective commitment in nonprofit organizations

A fair share: Effects of disparity, allocation strategy and system justification on perceptions of policy support in the education domain

On the Universality of Justice Norm and the Distribution of Material Goods

Efficiency, entitlements and deservingness: Perspectives on international distributive justice

Fairness, social norms and the cultural demand for redistribution

Sustainability and Fairness Simulations Based on Decision-Making Model of Utility Function and Norm Function