Fairness, expectations and life satisfaction: evidence from Europe

Daphne Nicolitsas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-023-09602-y
2024-01-31
Empirica
Abstract:This study aims to investigate whether individual beliefs about the fairness of society can account for differences in life satisfaction. Fairness here encompasses both procedural and distributive justice. The paper uses fifth-round individual-level data from the European Social Survey (ESS). The round in question contains information that can be used as a proxy for procedural justice, in the form of individual assessment of how the courts operate in their country. It also contains variables that will serve as a proxy for distributive justice. To that end we use survey information on individual assessment of whether pay is appropriate as well as a variable measuring the gap between received and expected pay. The latter is constructed using pay information and individuals' personal demographic and productive features, as well as information on the characteristics of their workplace. The hypothesis that life satisfaction is impacted by perceived unfairness cannot be rejected. Furthermore, we find that dissatisfaction with pay increases when individuals have a negative view of procedural justice.
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore whether individuals' beliefs about social fairness can explain differences in life satisfaction. Specifically, the paper examines the following aspects: 1. **The relationship between procedural justice and life satisfaction**: The paper tests how individuals' assessments of the fairness of the judicial system affect their life satisfaction. 2. **The relationship between pay expectations and life satisfaction**: The paper explores whether actual pay falling short of personal expectations leads to a decrease in life satisfaction. 3. **The relationship between procedural justice and perceptions of pay fairness**: The paper analyzes whether individuals' assessments of procedural justice affect their evaluations of pay fairness. 4. **The impact of procedural injustice on pay dissatisfaction**: The paper examines whether perceived procedural injustice exacerbates pay dissatisfaction. ### Main Hypotheses 1. **Hypothesis 1 (H1)**: A more positive view of procedural justice is associated with higher life satisfaction. 2. **Hypothesis 2 (H2)**: Individuals who believe their pay is fair will have higher life satisfaction. 3. **Hypothesis 3 (H3)**: Procedural injustice not only directly affects life satisfaction but also indirectly affects life satisfaction by influencing perceptions of pay fairness. A positive view of procedural justice reduces disappointment with pay adequacy. 4. **Hypothesis 4 (H4)**: The higher the perceived likelihood of procedural injustice, the stronger the association between pay dissatisfaction and life dissatisfaction. ### Research Background In recent years, the view that fair pay is more important than high pay has garnered widespread attention. Research indicates that if individuals feel they are treated fairly, they will have greater trust in their organization, management, and colleagues. This trust is considered a major driver of satisfaction. Therefore, the paper further explores whether this sense of fairness extends beyond the work environment to other aspects of life. If individuals believe they may be treated unfairly both inside and outside of work, does this strengthen their assessment of mistreatment in the work environment? These questions form the core of this study. ### Data Source The paper uses data from the fifth round of the European Social Survey (ESS). These data include individuals' views on the fairness of the judicial system and distributive justice, as well as variables used to construct the gap between actual and expected pay. The study focuses on 14 high-income European countries, including 12 early EU member states and 2 high-income countries in the European Economic Area (Switzerland and Norway). ### Conclusion Through empirical analysis, the paper validates the above hypotheses, showing that individuals' perceptions of social fairness indeed have a significant impact on life satisfaction. Specifically, individuals with a positive view of procedural justice and those who believe their pay is fair have higher life satisfaction. Additionally, when individuals perceive procedural injustice, the negative impact of pay dissatisfaction on life satisfaction is more pronounced.