Abstract:Understanding lay theories on the causes of economic inequality is the first step to comprehending why people tolerate, justify, or react against it. Accordingly, this paper aims to develop and validate with two cross-sectional studies the Attributions for Cross-Country Inequality Scale (ACIS), which assesses how people explain cross-country economic inequality–namely, the uneven distribution of income and wealth between poor and rich countries. After selecting and adapting items from existing scales of attributions for poverty and wealth, in Study 1, we tested the factorial structure of this initial pool of items in three countries with different levels of economic development and inequality, namely, Italy ( n = 246), the UK ( n = 248), and South Africa ( n = 228). Three causal dimensions emerged from the Exploratory Factor Analysis: "rich countries" (blaming the systematic advantage of and exploitation by rich countries), "poor countries" (blaming the dispositional inadequacy and faults of poor countries), and "fate" (blaming destiny and luck). The retained items were administered in Study 2 to three new samples from Italy ( n = 239), the UK ( n = 249), and South Africa ( n = 248). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) corroborated the factorial structure of the ACIS, and Multi-Group CFA supported configural and metric invariances of the scale across countries. In addition, we show internal consistency and construct validity of the scale: the scale correlates with relevant constructs (e.g., beliefs about cross-country inequality and ideological orientation) and attitudes toward relevant policies related to international redistribution and migration. Overall, the scale is a valid instrument to assess causal attribution for cross-national inequality and is reliable across countries. By focusing on resource distribution from an international perspective, this scale will allow researchers to broaden the discussion on economic inequality to a global level.

Inequality perception and preferences globally and locally - correlational evidence from a large-scale cross-country survey

Perceived income inequality, perceived unfairness and subjective social status in Europe

Unpackaging the link between economic inequality and self-construal

Income and Geographically Constrained Generosity

Why are some countries rich and others poor? development and validation of the attributions for Cross-Country Inequality Scale (ACIS)

Individual values predict desiring more economic inequality: The moderator role of social mobility

Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception

Are there inequality spillovers? Evidence through a modified inequality measure and European dynamics of inequality

Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality.

Perceived economic inequality inhibits pro‐environmental engagement

Are Fairness Perceptions Shaped by Income Inequality? Evidence from Latin America

Subjective socioeconomic status and income inequality are associated with self-reported morality across 67 countries

Effects of objective and subjective indicators of economic inequality on subjective well‐being: Underlying mechanisms

Perceptions of having less in the U.S. but having more in China are associated with stronger inequality aversion

Economic Inequality and Class Consciousness

Economic inequality affects perceived normative values

High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization

Economic and social consequences of gender attitudes in Eastern Europe – evidence from survey data*

How Social Class Shapes Attitudes on Economic Inequality: The Competing Forces of Self-Interest and Legitimation

Restless in an Unequal World: Economic Inequality Fuels the Desire for Wealth and Status

Normative effect of economic inequality: empirical evidence about conspicuous consumption (Efecto normativo de la desigualdad económica: evidencias empíricas sobre el consumo conspicuo)