Abstract:Abstract Artificial intelligence in higher education is becoming more prevalent as it promises improvements and acceleration of administrative processes concerning student support, aiming for increasing student success and graduation rates. For instance, Academic Performance Prediction (APP) provides individual feedback and serves as the foundation for distributing student support measures. However, the use of APP with all its challenges (e.g., inherent biases) significantly impacts the future prospects of young adults. Therefore, it is important to weigh the opportunities and risks of such systems carefully and involve affected students in the development phase. This study addresses students’ fairness perceptions of the distribution of support measures based on an APP system. First, we examine how students evaluate three different distributive justice norms, namely, equality , equity , and need . Second, we investigate whether fairness perceptions differ between APP based on human or algorithmic decision-making, and third, we address whether evaluations differ between students studying science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) or social sciences, humanities, and the arts for people and the economy (SHAPE), respectively. To this end, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with a 2 $$\times$$ × 3 factorial design among n = 1378 German students, in which we utilized the distinct distribution norms and decision-making agents as design factors. Our findings suggest that students prefer an equality-based distribution of support measures, and this preference is not influenced by whether APP is based on human or algorithmic decision-making. Moreover, the field of study does not influence the fairness perception, except that students of STEM subjects evaluate a distribution based on the need norm as more fair than students of SHAPE subjects. Based on these findings, higher education institutions should prioritize student-centric decisions when considering APP, weigh the actual need against potential risks, and establish continuous feedback through ongoing consultation with all stakeholders.

A fair share: Effects of disparity, allocation strategy and system justification on perceptions of policy support in the education domain

Impacts Of Social Comparison And Fairness Facet Preference On Justice Judgments

Distributive Justice and Higher Education Resource Allocation: Perceptions of Fairness

The Development of Children's Preferences for Equality and Equity Across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures.

Fairness of Academic Performance Prediction for the Distribution of Support Measures for Students: Differences in Perceived Fairness of Distributive Justice Norms

Weakly institutionalized, heavily contested: Does support for contemporary welfare reforms rely on norms of distributive justice?

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

Students’ views on fairness in education: the importance of relational justice and stakes fairness

Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality.

Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislators

Measuring Fairness and Justice in the Classroom: A Systematic Review of Instruments' Validity Evidence

Justifying Social Inequalities: The Role of Social Darwinism

The Role of Perceived Justice, Political Ideology, and Individual or Collective Framing in Support for Environmental Policies

Fairness Heuristics and Substitutability Effects: Inferring the Fairness of Outcomes, Procedures, and Interpersonal Treatment when Employees Lack Clear Information.

The fairness of human resource management practices: an assessment by the justice sensitive

Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression

How Should We Distribute Rewards in Social Sustainable Organizations? Investigating Individual Preferences for Justice Allocation Norms

Designing Resource Allocation Tools to Promote Fair Allocation: Do Visualization and Information Framing Matter?

Neurocomputational evidence that conflicting prosocial motives guide distributive justice

Unpacking equity. Educational equity in secondary analyses of international large-scale assessments: A systematic review