Abstract:Questions about justice arise whenever decisions are made about how resources should be allocated among people. Justice takes an important role in human social life, ensuring that people receive what they are due. Researchers from several fields have explored this question. In this chapter, justice will be examined from a social psychological perspective. The study of social justice has focused on two issues: distributive justice and procedural justice. In this chapter, I focus on distributive justice, which is also the first form of justice to capture the attention of justice researchers, although procedural justice has received somewhat more attention in the past decade (Cropanzana & Greenberg, 1997). Distributive justice concerns whether resource allocation is fair in terms of the outcome people receive. As the outcome always results from a specific set of processes or procedures, people are very concerned about whether the procedures themselves are fair (Leventhal, 1980; Lind & Tyler, 1988). Distributive justice theorists generally hold two perspectives on the justice norm that allocators use to distribute rewards. Equity theorists assume that the equity principle, which dictates that one’s obtained reward is in proportion to one’s contribution, is the only way to achieve the goal of “being fair to all” (Adams, 1965; Walster, Berscheid, & Walster, 1973). In contrast, multi-principle advocates have highlighted the importance of context in which the resource allocation occurs, and argue that principles other than equity, such as equality and need, may be more appropriate in some situations (Deutsch, 1975; Lerner, 1975; Leventhal, 1980).

How do people judge fairness in supervisor and peer relationships? Another assessment of the dimensions of justice

Impacts Of Social Comparison And Fairness Facet Preference On Justice Judgments

Employee Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, and Supervisor Justice Rule Compliance: A Three-Study Investigation.

The fairness of human resource management practices: an assessment by the justice sensitive

Fairness at the collective level: A meta-analytic examination of the consequences and boundary conditions of organizational justice climate.

The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework

Theoretical Basis and Influential Factors of Leaders’ Adherence to Fairness Rules

On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure.

It's not only what you do, but why you do it: How managerial motives influence employees' fairness judgments

Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.

Chinese Conceptions Of Justice And Reward Allocation

Fairness Heuristics and Substitutability Effects: Inferring the Fairness of Outcomes, Procedures, and Interpersonal Treatment when Employees Lack Clear Information.

An actor-focused model of justice rule adherence and violation: The role of managerial motives and discretion.

Fairness in human resource management, social exchange relationships, and citizenship behavior: testing linkages of the target similarity model among nurses in the United States

A cross‐level study of procedural justice perceptions

Fairness at the Organizational Level: Examining the Effect of Organizational Justice Climate on Collective Turnover Rates and Organizational Performance

Policy Justice:Concept, Measurement, and Effect on Distributive Justice

Empirical Research Regarding to the Relationship Between Justice Perception and Performance

Riding the Fifth Wave: Organizational Justice As Dependent Variable

RIDING THE INTEGRATIVE WAVE OF JUSTICE RESEARCH: POWER DISTANCE ORIENTATION AS A MODERATOR

Considering Self‐interests and Symbolism Together: How Instrumental and Value‐expressive Motives Interact to Influence Supervisors’ Justice Behavior