AB077. Explore the clinical experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for complex cases

Xiaojun Lu,Shancheng Ren,Yifan Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2018.ab077

2018-09-01

Translational Andrology and Urology

Abstract:AB077. Explore the clinical experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for complex cases

urology & nephrology,andrology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Experience of the Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy via Completely Posterior and Intrafascial Approach: A Report of 5 Cases

Gong-hui LI,You-yun ZHANG,Ming-chao WANG,Xue-dong CHEN,Shi-cheng YU,Shuai ZHANG,Guo-qing DING,Zhi-gen ZHANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7410.2016.04.007

2016-01-01

Abstract:Objective To briefly introduce the initial experience of the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) by completely posterior and intrafascial approach.Methods By retrospectively reviewing the clinical data of the 5 cases who received RALP by completely posterior and intrafascial approach between August 2016 and October 2016.Results All these 5 RALP by completely posterior and intrafascial approach were successfully completed.The operation time was between 124 and 155 minutes [(139.8±13.9) minutes on average].The estimated intraoperative blood loss was between 30 to 80 ml [(52.0±19.2) ml on average].No case with positive surgical margin was found.The serum PSA levels decreased to the criteria of radical prostatectomy 6 weeks postoperatively.Three patients were able to fully control their urination, with no need for diapers, and the other two regained full urinary continence within 1 month after surgery.Two patients recovered their erectile function within 1 month after surgery, while the other 3 patients didn't report erection function recover.Conclusions The tumor control, the postoperative urinary continence, and the erectile function recovery of the RALP by completely posterior and intrafascial approach are relatively satisfactory.It is feasible to perform this approach for selected suitable patients.
The Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Treating Urological Diseases: Experiences of 600 Cases in a Single Medical Center

夏丹,来翀,王平,景泰乐,叶孙益,秦杰,孔德波,汪朔

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2016.06.002

2016-01-01

Abstract:Objective To analyze and summarize the clinical data of 600 robotic-assisted urological surgeries at a single center,aiming to acquire a better understanding of the robotic techniques and emphasize its role in treating urological diseases.Methods Six hundred patients with urological diseases underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgeries from September 2014 to November 2015,including 473 males and 127 females with a mean age of (67.2 ± 6.8) years.The disease categary,surgical procedure selection,intraand post-operative data and short-term follow-up were reviewed and statistically compared.Results All 600 surgeries were performed successfully by the da Vinci system,and none of which was converted to the hand-assisted procedure.Three hundred and four radical prostatectomy and 185 renal surgeries were performed,including 9 radical nephrectomy,174 partial nephrectomy,2 radical nephrectomy plus vena cava thrombus removal.Pyeloplasties for ureteropelvic junction were performed in 27 cases.Radical cystectomy was performed in 12 patients,11 of which underwent Bricker conduit,while one patient underwent Studer ileal neobladder.Other surgeries,including adrenalectomy,resection of retroperitoneal tumor,retroperitoneal lymphadectomy,retrocaval ureteral angioplasty,transportation of the left renal vein,were performed in 72 patients.Complications occured in 117patients (19.5％).No patient died of surgery.Intra-peritoneal and extra-peritoneal approach of radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy were compared in details.The extra-peritoneal approach neither prolonged the hospital stay after the operation nor increased the incidence of positive margin (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions The da Vinci robotic system can be widely used to treat urological diseases,particularly in surgeries requiring suture in a small cavity.Our experiences offer an encouraging experiences on robotic peritoneal surgeries.Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy are safe and applicable,offering another minimally invasive choice for appropriate patients.
Treatment of Prostatic Stromal Sarcoma with Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Young Adult: A Case Report

Qi-Qi Mao,Shuo Wang,Ping Wang,Jie Qin,Dan Xia,Li-Ping Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4249

2016-01-01

Oncology Letters

Abstract:The present study reports a rare case of prostatic stromal sarcoma (PSS) treated with a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP). A 32-year-old man presented to the Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, China) with obstructive voiding symptoms that had persisted for 2 years. A computed tomography scan of the pelvis revealed an 8-cm prostatic mass protruding into the bladder. A transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy revealed a diagnosis of PSS. An RLRP was performed, and neither chemotherapy nor radiation therapy were administered prior to or subsequent to the surgery. No recurrence of the tumor was indicated at 6 months post-surgery. To the best of our knowledge, ≤30 cases of PSS have been reported in the English literature, and the present study is only the second case to be treated with RLRP.
A Comparison Of Perioperative Outcome Between Robot-Assisted And Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience Of A Single Institution

Feng Qi,Shangqian Wang,Haoxiang Xu,Yiren Gao,Gong Cheng,Lixin Hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0367

2019-01-01

International braz j urol

Abstract:Purpose: To compare perioperative and pathological results in different approaches of robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 206 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PC) from June 2016 to October 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. A total of 132 cases underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) including 54 patients on transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (Tp-RLRP) and 78 on extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (Ep-RLRP). Meanwhile, 74 patients performed with extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (Ep-LPR) were also included. Peri-operative and pathological data were compared among these groups.Results: All operations were completed without conversion. There was no significant difference in basic and pathological characteristics of patients between each two groups.In Tp-RLRP vs. Ep-RLRP: Significant differences were found in the comparison in total operation time [235.98 +/- 59.16 vs. 180.45 +/- 50.27 min, P = 0.00], estimated blood loss (EBL) [399.07 +/- 519.57 vs. 254.49 +/- 308.05 mL, P = 0.0473], postoperative pelvic drainage time [5.37 +/- 2.33 vs. 4.24 +/- 3.08 d, P = 0.0237] and postoperative length of stay [8.15 +/- 3.30 vs. 6.49 +/- 3.49 d, P = 0.0068] while no significant differences were detected in other variables.In Ep-RLRP vs. Ep-LPR: Longer total operation time was observed in Ep-RLRP when compared to Ep-LPR [180.45 +/- 50.27 vs. 143.80 +/- 33.13 min, P = 0.000]. No significant differences were observed in other variables.Conclusion: In RLRP, Ep-RLRP was proved a safe and effective approach based on the perioperative results compared to Tp-RLRP. Ep-RLRP and Ep-LPR provides equivalent perioperative and pathological outcomes.
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of 130 cases

LIU Yu-jun,GUO Jian-ming,WU Rui-yi,XU Ming,RONG Rui-ming,ZHU Yan-jun,CHEN Wei,ZHANG Jian-ping,JIANG Shuai,XU Lei,YANG Yuan-feng,WANG Hang,ZHU Tong-yu

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To assess the efficiency and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostectomy(RARP). Methods A retrospective chart review was perfomed, 130 patients radical prostatectomy(RARP) with da Vinci S surgical system(da Vinci Intuitive Surgical Inc.,Sunnyvale,CA, USA)from July 2009 to September 2013 localized prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted. The clinical data of patients underwent RARP were analyzed. The age range was 48 ~ 76years,mean(67 ± 6)years. The PSA level range was 2.16 ~ 78.20ng/mL,mean(26.05 ± 8.41)ng/mL. Gleason score was 6 ~ 10. Tumor clinical stage of all patients are localized prostate cancer. Results All 130 patients received successful robot-assisted operation and encountered no technique events. A five or six ports transperitonealapproach using a 3 or 4-arm da Vinci S surgical system was used to perform RARP. The preoperative set- up time of the da Vinci S surgical system was 20 ~ 90min,mean(48.5 ± 15.4)min. The operating time range was 90 ~ 300min,mean(143.6 ± 22.9)min. The estimated blood loss was 50-600ml,mean( 158.2 ± 59.6)ml,and 2(1.5%)patients need transfusion. The patients were ambulant between 2nd and 3rd postoperative day,mean(2.2 ± 0.6)d and discharged on postoperative day 5 to 21,mean(6.6 ± 1.9)d. Foley catheter was removed on postoperative day 4 to 21,mean(6.1 ± 2.0)d. The main postoperative complications including:the urinary leak in six patients(4.6%),prolonged lymphorrhea in eight patients(6.2%),but not presented any form of lymphocele. Deep vein thrombosis,pulmonary embolism and epididymitis presented in one patient respectively. Histopathology confirmed in positive surgical margin 12(9.2%)cases,seminal vesicle invasion in 10(7.7%)cases and lymph node invasion in 4(3.1%)cases. The PSA was less than 0.2 ng/ml during follow-up of one to twelve months postoperatively. The pad-free continence rate was 86% and 95% in postoperative month 6 and one year respectively. Conclusions Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has the advantage of mini-invasiveness,less blood loss, rapid postoperative recovery. It is safe,reliable and feasible. RARP should be taken as the first choice for radical prostatectomy.
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic modified ureteroplasty using lingual mucosa grafts or appendiceal flaps for the management of complex ureteral strictures: a retrospective cohort study

Haoxiang Xu,Chenglin Yang,Shengtao Zeng,Zhi Cao,Yue Yang,Jiatao Ye,Zhengfei Hu,Yuansong Xiao,Xiaoming Zhang,Wei Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02601-1

2024-10-13

BMC Surgery

Abstract:To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic modified ureteroplasty using a lingual mucosa graft (LMG) or an appendiceal flap (AF) for complex ureteral strictures and summarize our experience.

surgery
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Study

Shubo Fan,Zhongyuan Zhang,Jie Wang,Shengwei Xiong,Xiaofei Dai,Xu Chen,Zhihua Li,Guanpeng Han,Jun Zhu,Han Hao,Wei Yu,Liang Cui,Cheng Shen,Xuesong Li,Liqun Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000002498

2022-04-18

Abstract:PURPOSE: Our goal was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01) system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-center, single-arm clinical study was conducted from May 2021 to August 2021. Sixteen RARP procedures with the KD-SR-01 system were performed by 1 surgeon. The perioperative and followup data were prospectively recorded. Early oncologic outcomes were assessed according to surgical margin status and continence was defined as no more than 1 pad daily or urine leakage of ≤20 gm by the 24-hour pad weight test. Ergonomics were assessed with the NASA-TLX (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index).RESULTS: All cases were completed successfully without conversion to traditional RARP, laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. The median docking time, console time and urethrovesical anastomosis time were 5.9 (range, 2.5-11.5), 87 (range, 70-120) and 14.4 minutes (range, 12.0-25.7), respectively. The median estimated blood loss was 50 ml (range, 10-200). None of patients required intraoperative transfusion. The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range, 4-10). Overall, a positive surgical margin occurred in 4 (25%) patients. No biochemical recurrence occurred within 1 month after surgery. The continence rate was 87.5% (14/16) at 1 month after catheter removal. No severe intraoperative or postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred. The surgeon reported a high comfort level with a NASA-TLX global score of 22.7±3.2.CONCLUSIONS: The KD-SR-01 system is feasible, safe and effective for management of localized prostate cancer.

urology & nephrology
Recent advances in single-site/incision robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Shangqing Ren,Yang Zheng,Xu Hu,Yige Bao,Dong Wang,Yifan Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.213

IF: 4.037

2023-03-15

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Abstract:Introduction Single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (ssRARP) has been successfully applied to treat prostate cancer. This review aims to describe the recent advances of surgical approaches, working accesses and novel robotic platforms in ssRARP. Material and methods A systematic literature search was performed by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus databases in December 2022 to identify all literature related to ssRARP. Results A total of 48 relevant studies were found worldwide from 2008 to 2023. Since the introduction of ssRARP, various modifications of this technique in surgical approaches, working accesses and novel robotic platforms have been developed. The application of ssRARP using the da Vinci SP platform has shown great superiority with encouraging clinical outcomes. Discussion There has been a potential shift toward ssRARP using the da Vinci SP platform due to its potential advantages in terms of lower blood loss, minimal postoperative pain, better cosmetic outcome and rapid recovery. More convincing evidence, further technical improvement and higher cost-effectiveness are needed for its widespread acceptance.

oncology,surgery
[Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer (with Video)].

Hong-Qian Guo,Xiao-Gong Li,Wei-Dong Gan,Gu-Tian Zhang,Lin-Feng Xu,Feng Qu,Xiao-Zhi Zhao,Lin-Fang Yao,Shi-Wei Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13263/j.cnki.2017.01.005

2017-01-01

Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the application of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) in the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer.METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 10 cases of early-stage prostate cancer treated by RS-RARP with the Da Vinci Robot Surgical System from September to October 2016.RESULTSAll the operations were successfully completed without positive surgical margins. The operation time was 170－250 min (［196±25］ min), the intraoperative blood loss was 150－500 ml (［260±128］ ml), the postoperative hospital stay was 6－7 days, and the catheterization time was 14 days. Urinary continence occurred after catheter removal in 1 patient and was recovered 1 month later.CONCLUSIONSRS-RARP is a safe, effective and reliable method for the treatment of prostate cancer and conducive to the early recovery of urinary continence.
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy(Report of 61 cases)

孙立安,王国民,徐志兵,刘宇军,郭剑明,许明,戎瑞明,朱延军,陈伟

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2013.01.004

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To assess the efficiency and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostectomy(RARP).Methods:We performed a retrospective chart review,evaluating 106 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic urological surgery with da Vinci S surgical system(da Vinci Intuitive Surgical Inc.,Sunnyvale,CA,USA)from July 2009 to August 2012.Of the patients,Including 61 patients with local prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP).The clinical data of patients of RARP were analyzed.Results:All sixty-one patients received successful robot-assisted operation and encountered no technique events.The preoperative set-up time of the da Vinci S surgical system was 45-90min,mean(62.7±12.4)min.The operating time ranged 120to 300min,mean(153.8±21.7) min.The estimated bloods loss was 50-600ml,mean(138.2±59.1)ml,and 2(3.3%)patients need transfusion.The patients were ambulant between 2nd and 3rd postoperative day,mean(2.2±0.6)d and discharged on postoperative day 5to 8,mean(6.3±0.9)d.Foley catheter was removed on postoperative day 5 to 14,mean (8.7±2.9)d.Histopathology confirmed that 6(9.8%) cases were positive surgical margin,seminal vesicle invasion in 4(6.5%) and lymph node invasion in 3(4.9%).The t-PSA was less than 0.2μg/L during follow-up of one to twelve months and 10(16.3%) cases were incontinence in postoperative month 3.Conclusions:Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has the advantage of mini-invasiveness,less blood loss,rapid postoperative recovery,and it is a safe,reliable and should be taken as the first choice for radical prostatectomy.RARP offers better results in terms of the benefit of minimally invasive surgery.RARP is becoming the preferred approach for radical prostatectomy.
Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01463-2

2024-03-27

BMC Urology

Abstract:Consolidative resection or cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (CRP) may benefit men with non-organ confined prostate cancer. We report the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic CRP using a single-port (SP) or multi-port (MP) platform.

urology & nephrology
Clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer via different approaches and analysis of factors affecting urinary continence function

张志明,桑楠,邱建新,张波,薛炜

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn431460-20201014-00001

2021-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted radical resection of prostatic cancer through different approaches，and analyze factors affecting urinary continence function.Methods:From March 2017 to May 2019，103 patients with prostatic cancer underwent robotic-assisted radical resection in our hospital were enrolled，and divided into two groups according to different surgical approaches.Group A(53 cases)received surgery through anterior bladder approach，while group B(50 cases)received surgery through posterior bladder approach.The perioperative indicators，quality of life score，Gleason score，prostate specific antigen(PSA), and urinary continence efficiency of two groups were compared，and the influencing factors of urinary continence function after operation were analyzed.Results:The operation time，intraoperative blood loss，hospital stay length，and catheter indwelling time in group A were significantly lower than those in group B( P<0.05)．The urinary continence efficiency at postoperative 3 months showed no significant difference between groups(67.9%vs.58.0%， P>0.05). At postoperative 1 month and 3 months，the quality of life score and Gleason score were increased in both groups( P<0.05), and were higher in group A than in group B( P<0.05), meanwhile，the PSA was decreased in both groups( P<0.05), and was lower in group A than in group B( P<0.05). The urinary control rate of patients with body mass index<28 kg/m 2, posterior cervical membrane weight and bladder neck，longest urethra and neurovascular bundle were significantly higher than those with body mass index≥28 kg/m 2，without posterior cervical membrane weight，without retaining bladder neck，longest urethra and neurovascular bundle( P<0.05)．Body mass index≥28 kg/m 2 and neurovascular bundle injury were risk factors for postoperative urinary continence function( P<0.05). Conclusions:Robotic-assisted radical resection of prostatic cancer via anterior bladder approach has less bleeding and better postoperative urinary continence function，which can effectively improve the quality of life，moreover，obesity and neurovascular bundle injury exert adverse effects on postoperative urinary continence function.
Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?

Haci Ibrahim Cimen,Yavuz Tarik Atik,Serkan Altinova,Oztug Adsan,Mevlana Derya Balbay,admin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0184

2019-10-05

International Braz J Urol: official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Abstract:Vol. 45 (1): 54-60, January – February, 2019 doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0184 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Haci Ibrahim Cimen 1, Yavuz Tarik Atik 1, Serkan Altinova 2, Oztug Adsan 1, Mevlana Derya Balbay 3 1 Department of Urology, Sakarya University, School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey; 2 Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey; 3 American Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey [...]
Surgical and medical co-management optimizes surgical outcomes in older patients with chronic diseases undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Wenning Lu,Chaoyang Liu,Jing He,Rong Wang,Dewei Gao,Rui Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2022.2159368

Abstract:Introduction: While robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is a standard mode for localized prostate cancer (PC), the risk of complications in older patients with chronic diseases and complex medical conditions can be a deterrent to surgery. Surgical and medical co-management (SMC) is a new strategy to improve patients' healthcare outcomes in surgical settings. Methods: We reviewed the clinical data of older patients with chronic diseases who were cared for with SMC undergoing RRP in our hospital in the past 3 years and compared them with the clinical data from the general urology ward. Preoperative conditions and related indicators of recovery, and incidence of postoperative complications with the Clavien Grade System were compared between these two groups. Results: The indicators of recovery were significantly better, and the incidence rates of complications were significantly reduced in the SMC group at grades I-IV (p < 0.05), as compared to the general urology ward group. Conclusions: The provision of care by SMC for older patients focused on early identification, comorbidity management, preoperative optimization, and collaborative management would significantly improve surgical outcomes. The SMC strategy is worthy of further clinical promotion in RRP treatment in older men with chronic diseases and complex medical conditions.
Comparison Of Perioperative Outcomes In Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy And Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Shiwei Zhang,Tingsheng Lin,Qing Zhang,Shengjie Zhang,Guangxiang Liu,Changwei Ji,Hongqian Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2074

2020-01-01

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Abstract:Objective To report perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and laparoscopic radical cystectomy.Patients and Methods Between January 2010 and July 2019, 298 patients with bladder cancer underwent robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (n = 172) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) (n = 126) at our institution were enrolled in the retrospective study. The demographic, perioperative, and complication data were collected and analyzed.Results The RARC group had less operative duration (P < .001), less blood loss (P < .001), lower transfusion rate (P < .05), and shorter hospital stay (P < .001) than the LRC group. The 90-day readmission rate between the RARC and LRC group had no significant differences (P = .401). The 90-day overall complication rates in the RARC group was much lower than the LRC group (P = .009). The 90-day minor complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade <= IIA) between the RARC and LRC groups were similar (P = .274). The 90-day major complication rates (Clavien-Dindo grade >= IIIA) in the LRC group was higher than the RARC group (P = .022).Conclusions The RARC approach appears to offer some operative and perioperative benefits compared with the LRC approach. Larger, randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.
Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a new robotic surgical system: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial

Jie Dong,Ruoyu Ji,Liang Cui,Guanghua Liu,Yi Xie,Jingmin Zhou,Huizhen Wang,Weifeng Xu,Zhigang Ji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-12855-w

IF: 4.638

2024-09-29

BMC Cancer

Abstract:Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) gains increasing popularity in the surgical management of prostate cancer (PCa) but is challenged by its prohibitive expense. A domestic robotic system has been developed to address this issue, but data comparing the self-developed robot with the widely used robot is lacking. We performed a randomized clinical trial to compare KD-SR-01 ® and DaVinci ® robots in terms of perioperative, short-term oncological and functional outcomes in RARP.

oncology
Comparative studies of robot-assisted surgery,laparoscopic,and retropubic radical prostatectomy

WANG Guomin,XU Zhibing,JIANG Shuai,ZHANG Jianping,LIU Yujun,ZHU Tongyu

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To assess the efficiency and safety of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP) and to compare it with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(LRP) and retropubic radical prostatectomy(RRP). Methods We performed a non-randomized,prospective comparative study to evaluate 5 consecutive patients receiving RARP with da Vinci S surgical system(da Vinci Intuitive Surgical Inc.,Sunnyvale,CA,USA) from July 2009 to May 2010.And we enrolled 5 consecutive patients for LRP and 5 for RRP during the same period.The clinical data of patients in the above three groups were compared and analyzed.Results All patients in the 3 groups received successful operation.The 5 patients in the RARP group encountered no technique events and they were not transferred to other operations.For RARP.the median preoperative set-up time of the da Vinci S surgical system was 55(45-90) min.The median operating time was 240(220-300) min,the estimated blood loss was 200(50 - 600) mL and no patients needed transfusion.The patients were ambulant between 2nd and 3rd postoperative day and discharged on postoperative day 5 to 8.Foley catheter was removed on postoperative day 10 to 14.Histopathology confirmed that one patient had positive surgical margin,and the t-PSA was less than 0.2 ng/mL during follow-up(1-12 months).Two cases had slight incontinence during one month after operation. For the 5 patients receiving LRP,the median operation time was 200(180-270) min,and mean blood loss was 150(50-500) mL,with no blood transfusion.The patients were ambulant between the 4th and 5th postoperative day and discharged on postoperative day 6 to 16;the Foley catheter was removed on postoperative day 14 to 21.Histopathology confirmed that one patient had positive surgical margin,and the t-PSA was less than 0.2 ng/mL during follow-up.Conclusions Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has the advantage of mini-invasiveness. less blood loss,rapid postoperative recovery,and it is safe,reliable and should be taken as the first choice for radical prostatectomy.RARP offers better results than LRP and RRP in terms of minimal invasiveness.RARP is becoming the preferred approach for radical prostatectomy.
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Trifecta Learning Curve for Surgeons with Previous Experience in Laparoscopy

Altez-Fernandez Carlos,Vazquez-Martul Dario,Răzvan-Ionut Popescu,Corrales Mariela,Chantada-Abal Venancio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60071032

2024-06-24

Abstract:Background and Objectives: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a complex surgery with a steep learning curve (LC). No clear evidence exists for how previous laparoscopic experience affects the RARP LC. We report the LC of three surgeons with vast experience in laparoscopy (more than 400 procedures), analyzing the results of functional and oncological outcomes under the "Trifecta" concept (defined as the achievement of continence, potency, and oncological control free of biochemical recurrence). Materials and Methods: The surgical experience of the three surgeons from September 2021 to December 2022, involving 146 RARP consecutive patients in a single institution center, was evaluated prospectively. Erectile disfunction patients were excluded. ANOVA and chi-square test were used to compare the distribution of variables between the three surgeons. LC analysis was performed using the cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) technique to achieve trifecta. Results: The median age was 65.42 (±7.34); the clinical stage were T1c (68%) and T2a (32%); the biopsy grades were ISUP 1 (15.9%), ISUP 2 (47.98), and ≥ISUP 3 (35%). The median surgical time was 132.8 (±32.8), and the mean intraoperative bleeding was 186 cc (±115). Complications included the following: Clavien-Dindo I 8/146 (5.47%); II 9/146 (6.16%); and III 3/146 (2.05%). Positive margins were reported in 44/146 (30.13%). The PSA of 145/146 patients (99%) at 6 months was below 0.08. Early continence was achieved in 101/146 (69.17%), 6-month continence 126/146 (86%), early potency 51/146 (34.9%), and 6-month potency 65/146 (44%). Surgeons "a", "b", and "c" performed 50, 47, and 49 cases, respectively. After CUSUM analysis, the "Trifecta" LC peak was achieved at case 19 in surgeon "a", 21 in surgeon "b", and 20 in surgeon "c". Conclusions: RARP LC to accomplish "Trifecta" can be significantly reduced in surgeons with previous experience in laparoscopy and be achieved at around 20 cases.
[Advances in Radical Prostatectomy].

Liping Xie,Xiangyi Zheng,Xiaofeng Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-3591.2004.03.001

2004-01-01

Abstract:In the western world, adenocarcinoma of the prostate is the most common malignant neoplasm of human males. In recent years, the incidence of the disease has increased dramatically in China. Surgery is an important treatment for prostate cancer. This article reviews the progress in radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy, standard laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. It covers the necessity, techniques and experience of surgery, nerve preserving techniques and erectile dysfunction, complications and outcomes, advantages and disadvantages of and comparison between various surgical approaches.
Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Our Clinical Experience and a Systematic Review

Jesús Moreno Sierra,M. Ciappara Paniagua,M.I. Galante Romo,J.L. Senovilla Pérez,E. Redondo González,M.I. Galindo Herrero,N. Novo Gómez,J. Blázquez Izquierdo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000446323

2016-01-01

Urologia Internationalis

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Radical prostatectomy is a more skillful procedure in kidney graft recipients. Robotic surgery can provide a useful minimally invasive tool.OBJECTIVES: The study aims to evaluate the robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in kidney transplant recipients, describing intra/postoperative complications, renal and oncological outcomes.METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted in a single institution of 84 RALP. Four of them were kidney transplant recipients. Side of the renal graft, clinical stage, intra/postoperative events, operating time, creatinine levels before/after intervention and oncologic follow-up were recorded. A systematic review of the literature was performed.RESULTS: Aged 61.25 ± 7.76 years, interval between renal transplantation and RALP: 10 ± 3.16 years. Mean prostate specific antigen: 7.1 ± 2.8 ng/ml, 2 patients were cT1c and 2 cT2a. Preoperative biopsies: Gleason score 3 + 3 in 3 patients, 3 + 4 in 1 patient. Charlson comorbidity index mean was 4.82 ± 0.82. No intra/postoperative events were reported. Mean operating time: 196 ± 20.8 min. Positive surgical margins: 2/4 patients. Pathological analysis: Gleason 3 + 4 in 2 patients and Gleason 3 + 3 in the others 2. A patient developed a bladder neck sclerosis. No differences between pre/postoperative creatinine. Three patients are free of biochemical recurrence and 1 patient required adjuvant radiotherapy.CONCLUSION: RALP in renal transplant recipients is a safe and feasible technique for localized prostate cancer. No difference in oncological outcomes and no impairments on renal function were found.

urology & nephrology

AB077. Explore the clinical experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for complex cases

Experience of the Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy via Completely Posterior and Intrafascial Approach: A Report of 5 Cases

The Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Treating Urological Diseases: Experiences of 600 Cases in a Single Medical Center

Treatment of Prostatic Stromal Sarcoma with Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Young Adult: A Case Report

A Comparison Of Perioperative Outcome Between Robot-Assisted And Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience Of A Single Institution

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of 130 cases

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic modified ureteroplasty using lingual mucosa grafts or appendiceal flaps for the management of complex ureteral strictures: a retrospective cohort study

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Study

Recent advances in single-site/incision robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

[Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer (with Video)].

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy(Report of 61 cases)

Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform

Clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer via different approaches and analysis of factors affecting urinary continence function

Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?

Surgical and medical co-management optimizes surgical outcomes in older patients with chronic diseases undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Comparison Of Perioperative Outcomes In Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy And Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a new robotic surgical system: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial

Comparative studies of robot-assisted surgery,laparoscopic,and retropubic radical prostatectomy

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) Trifecta Learning Curve for Surgeons with Previous Experience in Laparoscopy

[Advances in Radical Prostatectomy].

Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Our Clinical Experience and a Systematic Review