Abstract:Importance: Technical skill in complex surgical procedures may affect clinical outcomes, and there is growing interest in understanding the clinical implications of surgeon proficiency levels. Objectives: To determine whether surgeon scores representing technical skills of robot-assisted kidney surgery are associated with patient outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: This quality improvement study included 10 urological surgeons participating in a surgical collaborative in Michigan from July 2021 to September 2022. Each surgeon submitted up to 7 videos of themselves performing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Videos were segmented into 6 key steps, yielding 127 video clips for analysis. Each video clip was deidentified and distributed to at least 3 of the 24 blinded peer surgeons from the collaborative who also perform robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Reviewers rated technical skill and provided written feedback. Statistical analysis was performed from May 2023 to January 2024. Main outcomes and measures: Reviewers scored each video clip using a validated instrument to assess technical skill for partial nephrectomy on a scale of 1 to 5 (higher scores indicating greater skill). For all submitting surgeons, outcomes from a clinical registry were assessed for length of stay (LOS) greater than 3 days, estimated blood loss (EBL) greater than 500 mL, warm ischemia time (WIT) greater than 30 minutes, positive surgical margin (PSM), 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, and 30-day readmission. Results: Among the 27 unique surgeons who participated in this study as reviewers and/or individuals performing the procedures, 3 (11%) were female, and the median age was 47 (IQR, 39-52) years. Risk-adjusted outcomes were associated with scores representing surgeon skills. The overall performance score ranged from 3.5 to 4.7 points with a mean (SD) of 4.1 (0.4) points. Greater skill was correlated with significantly lower rates of LOS greater than 3 days (-6.8% [95% CI, -8.3% to -5.2%]), EBL greater than 500 mL (-2.6% [95% CI, -3.0% to -2.1%]), PSM (-8.2% [95% CI, -9.2% to -7.2%]), ED visits (-3.9% [95% CI, -5.0% to -2.8%]), and readmissions (-5.7% [95% CI, -6.9% to -4.6%]) (P < .001 for all). Higher overall score was also associated with higher partial nephrectomy volume (β coefficient, 11.4 [95% CI, 10.0-12.7]; P < .001). Conclusions and relevance: In this quality improvement study on video-based evaluation of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, higher technical skill was associated with lower rates of adverse clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that video-based evaluation plays a role in assessing surgical skill and can be used in quality improvement initiatives to improve patient care.

Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?

Anesthesia management and patient outcomes in robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery: A single center experience

Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy by the Hugo Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) System and the da Vinci System: A Comparison between the Two Platforms

Experience of the Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy via Completely Posterior and Intrafascial Approach: A Report of 5 Cases

From simulation to surgery, advancements and challenges in robotic training for radical prostatectomy: a narrative review

Surgeon Skill and Perioperative Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Analyzing the influence of expanding multispecialty adoption of robotic surgery on robotic urologic care

Intermediate-Term Oncological Outcome Assessment for Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Comparing Retzius Sparing to Standard Approach in a Randomized Control Cohort

Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based comparison

Experience of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after hemiablation of the prostate with high-intensity focused ultrasound using the Focal One robotic platform: clinical case

Learning Curve for Single-port Robot-assisted Urological Surgery: Single-center Experience and Implications for Adoption

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with the Novel Surgical Robotic Platform HugoTM RAS: Monocentric First Series of 132 Cases Reporting Surgical, and Early Functional and Oncological Outcomes at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the novel hinotoriTM surgical robot system: initial experience and operation learning curve at a single institution

First Impressions of the New da Vinci 5 Robotic Platform and Experience in Performing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

The Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Treating Urological Diseases: Experiences of 600 Cases in a Single Medical Center

Initial experience of treating prostate cancer patients with coronary artery disease through robot-assisted radical Prostatectomy

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open)

Comparison Of Perioperative Outcomes In Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy And Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Implementation and Validation of an Automated, Longitudinal Robotic Surgical Evaluation and Feedback Program at a High-volume Center and Impact on Training

Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Our Clinical Experience and a Systematic Review