The Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Treating Urological Diseases: Experiences of 600 Cases in a Single Medical Center

夏丹,来翀,王平,景泰乐,叶孙益,秦杰,孔德波,汪朔
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2016.06.002
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze and summarize the clinical data of 600 robotic-assisted urological surgeries at a single center,aiming to acquire a better understanding of the robotic techniques and emphasize its role in treating urological diseases.Methods Six hundred patients with urological diseases underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgeries from September 2014 to November 2015,including 473 males and 127 females with a mean age of (67.2 ± 6.8) years.The disease categary,surgical procedure selection,intraand post-operative data and short-term follow-up were reviewed and statistically compared.Results All 600 surgeries were performed successfully by the da Vinci system,and none of which was converted to the hand-assisted procedure.Three hundred and four radical prostatectomy and 185 renal surgeries were performed,including 9 radical nephrectomy,174 partial nephrectomy,2 radical nephrectomy plus vena cava thrombus removal.Pyeloplasties for ureteropelvic junction were performed in 27 cases.Radical cystectomy was performed in 12 patients,11 of which underwent Bricker conduit,while one patient underwent Studer ileal neobladder.Other surgeries,including adrenalectomy,resection of retroperitoneal tumor,retroperitoneal lymphadectomy,retrocaval ureteral angioplasty,transportation of the left renal vein,were performed in 72 patients.Complications occured in 117patients (19.5%).No patient died of surgery.Intra-peritoneal and extra-peritoneal approach of radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy were compared in details.The extra-peritoneal approach neither prolonged the hospital stay after the operation nor increased the incidence of positive margin (P > 0.05).Conclusions The da Vinci robotic system can be widely used to treat urological diseases,particularly in surgeries requiring suture in a small cavity.Our experiences offer an encouraging experiences on robotic peritoneal surgeries.Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy are safe and applicable,offering another minimally invasive choice for appropriate patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?