Abstract:Background and objective: The purpose-built SHURUI single-port (SP) robotic platform has recently been introduced for several procedures in urology, general surgery, and gynecology. However, comparative evidence on its performance in relation to earlier models such as the da Vinci SP is lacking. Our aim was to compare the step-by-step techniques and 1-yr outcomes for radical prostatectomy (RP) between the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP robots. Methods: Data were retrieved from two prospectively maintained databases. The SHURUI SP robot was used to perform RP in 34 patients in China (September 2021 to August 2022); the da Vinci SP robot was used to perform 100 consecutive RP cases in the USA (June 2019 to October 2020). A comparative analysis was conducted before and after 1:1 propensity score matching for age, body mass index, American Urological Association symptom score, prostate size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, biopsy grade group, and D'Amico risk group. Intraoperative performance and short-term oncological and continence outcomes were compared between the groups. Biochemical recurrence was defined as two consecutive postoperative PSA levels >0.2 ng/ml. Continence was defined as full recovery of urinary control without the use of pads. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate continence recovery curves, and a log-rank test for trend was used to detect ordered differences in continence recovery between the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP groups after surgery. Key findings and limitations: For the matched SHURUI and da Vinci groups, median age (69 vs 69 yr), median PSA (8.4 vs 7.1 ng/ml), and the proportion of patients with low-risk (33.3% vs 29.6%), intermediate-risk (66.7% vs 63%), and high-risk disease (0% vs 7.4%) were comparable (all p > 0.05). All surgeries were successfully accomplished without conversion. A higher percentage of cases in the SHURUI group involved extraperitoneal access (81.5% vs 0%; p < 0.001) and a pure SP approach (25.9% vs 0%; p = 0.01), while a higher percentage of cases in the da Vinci group had nerve-sparing surgery. The median total operative (215 vs 110 min; p < 0.001) and median console time (162 vs 75 min; p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the SHURUI group. No intraoperative or major postoperative complications were observed in either group. Rates of positive surgical margins (18.5% vs 14.8%; p = 1.0) and extraprostatic extension (14.8% vs 29.6%; p = 0.19) were similar. At median follow-up of 13.5 versus 15.9 mo, none of the patients had experienced biochemical recurrence. At 1 yr after surgery, the continence rate was 96.3% in both groups. Conclusions: Despite differences in driving mechanisms between the two SP robotic systems, RP can be performed safely and effectively with the SHURUI RP robot during the initial learning phase, with similar short-term oncological and continence outcomes to those with the da Vinci SP robot. Patient summary: We compared two surgical robots (SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP) used to perform robotic surgery to remove the prostate through a single keyhole incision instead of multiple incisions. Our results show comparable technology and similar surgical and short-term cancer control outcomes for the two robots.

Recent advances in single-site/incision robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Recent Advances and Future Horizons in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

Early Outcomes of Single-Site Versus Multi-Port Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Robot-assisted Single-port Radical Prostatectomy with the SHURUI SP and da Vinci SP Platforms: Comparison of the Technology, Intraoperative Performance, and Outcomes

Advancements in artificial intelligence for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men suffering from prostate cancer: results from a scoping review

Initial Experience of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Radical Prostatectomy with a Novel Purpose-Built Robotic System

A clinical evaluation of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in located prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Experience with an innovative surgical approach: 321 cases modified extraperitoneal single-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without dedicated PORT based on Da Vinci SI system

Surgical techniques of Da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: recent advances in urology

Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a new robotic surgical system: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial

A Comprehensive Review of the Current State of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Salvage Prostatectomy

Single-Port Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Feasibility and Early Outcomes

Transperineal Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Si Da Vinci Surgical System: Initial Experience and Description of Technique.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of 130 cases

Comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes of single-incision versus standard multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized trial

Current status, evolution, and future perspectives in robotic platform systems for prostate cancer treatment: a narrative review

MP58-08 SINGLE-PORT EXTRAPERITONEAL TRANSVESICAL ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY (RARP): FROM DA VINCI XI TO SHURUI SINGLE-PORT SURGICAL ROBOT

From simulation to surgery, advancements and challenges in robotic training for radical prostatectomy: a narrative review

Comparative studies of robot-assisted surgery,laparoscopic,and retropubic radical prostatectomy