Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

Openness and Impact of Leading Scientific Countries

Impact of Funding on Research Output: An Empirical Study on 10 Countries

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

Publish or Patent: Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies

Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data

The Effect of Competitive Public Funding on Scientific Output: A Comparison Between China and the EU

Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields

The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK

The Role of Positive and Negative Citations in Scientific Evaluation

The Correlation Between Scientific Collaboration and Citation Count at the Paper Level: a Meta-Analysis

Macro-level Indicators of the Relations between Research Funding and Research Output

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

Elevating International Collaboration and Academic Outcomes Through Strategic Research Funding: a Bibliometric Analysis of China Scholarship Council Funded Publications

Research Funding in Different SCI Disciplines: A Comparison Analysis Based on Web of Science

Impact of Scientific, Economic, Geopolitical, and Cultural Factors on International Research Collaboration

An International Comparison of the Citation Impact of Chinese Journals with Priority Funding

An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Government Support on University Knowledge Innovation

A Helping Hand from the Government? How Public Research Funding Affects Academic Output in Less-Prestigious Universities in China