Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

An International Comparison of the Citation Impact of Chinese Journals with Priority Funding

A Comparative Study of the Citation Impact of Chinese Journals with Government Priority Support.

A Comparative Study of Domestic and Cross‐country Impact of Chinese and U.S. Publications in Chemistry

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

Comparative Study of Chinese-English Scientific Topic Ranking Correlations: Computer Science Perspective

A Comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and inter-journal citation relations

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

The Citation Impacts and Citation Environments of Chinese Journals in Mathematics

An Analysis of the International Academic Influence of Academic Journals in China over the Three Decades Since Reform and Opening Up

Comparative Study Based on the Collaborative Fund Publications in Physics of China Published in CNKI and WoS

A Comparison among Citation-Based Journal Indicators and Their Relative Changes with Time

Openness and Knowledge Sharing of Economics,Sociology,Law and Politics:A Comparative Study on Citations of Chinese Social Science Journals

Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980–2011

Regional Analysis on Chinese Scientific Output

Characteristics of Research in China Assessed with Essential Science Indicators

A Bibliometric Perspective on the Roles of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research.

A Quantitative Evaluation System of Chinese Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Comparison of Independent Research of China’s Top Universities Using Bibliometric Indicators

The Citation-Based Indicator and Combined Impact Indicator-New Options for Measuring Impact

A Comparative Analysis of Publication Portfolios of Selected Economies.