Political Hegemony, Imitation Isomorphism, and Project Familiarity: Instrumental Variables to Understand Funding Impact on Scholar Performance

Yang Ding,Yi Bu

2024-11-07

Abstract:This paper contributes a new idea for exploring research funding effects on scholar performance. By collecting details of 9,501 research grants received by principal investigators from universities in the U.S. social sciences from 2000 to 2019 and data on their publications and citations in the Microsoft Academic Graph and Web of Science bibliographic collections, we build a novel dataset of grants and article counts, citations, and journal CiteScore. Based on this dataset, we first introduce three instrumental variables (IVs) suitable for isolating endogeneity issues in the study of competing grant effects, namely scholars' political hegemony in academia, imitation isomorphic behavior among scholars, and project familiarity. Then, this study explains the research funding effects by combining the three IVs with a two-stage least square (2SLS) model and by considering gaps from individual academics, universities, and research fields. Also, we provide validity and robustness tests of these three IVs and research funding effects. We find that our IVs serve the function of exogenizing and isolating endogeneity in capturing the research funding effect. Furthermore, empirical findings show that receiving research funding increases a scholar's research output and impact, but does not result in the scholar's research being published in more prestigious academic journals.

Digital Libraries

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: What exactly is the impact of research funding on scholars' scientific research performance? Specifically, by introducing three instrumental variables (IVs), namely scholars' academic - political resources, mimetic isomorphism behavior, and project familiarity, the author isolates and understands the endogeneity problem in the research funding effect. These instrumental variables aim to resolve the confusion in the relationship between research funding and scholars' performance due to selection bias and potential reverse causality.

### Background of the Main Problem

1. **The relationship between research funding and scholars' performance is controversial**:
- Previous studies have shown that it is inconclusive whether research funding can effectively enhance scholars' scientific research output and influence.
- There are selection biases and potential reverse causal relationships, which make it complicated to directly evaluate the effect of research funding.

2. **Endogeneity problem**:
- The allocation of research funding is usually based on applicants' past performance or potential ability, which may lead to reverse causality.
- Selection bias makes it easy to be confused when comparing scholars who have received funding and those who have not.

### Solutions

In order to more accurately evaluate the impact of research funding on scholars' performance, the author proposes the following methods:

1. **Construct a new data set**:
- Collected data on 9,501 research grants obtained by social science researchers in American universities, covering information from 2000 to 2019.
- Including indicators such as the number of publications, citation times, and journal CiteScore.

2. **Introduce three instrumental variables (IVs)**:
- **Academic - political resources**: Measure scholars' political influence in the academic community, such as holding important positions or having external resources.
- **Mimetic isomorphism behavior**: Reflect whether scholars will imitate the behavior of successful peers to increase their chances of obtaining funding.
- **Project familiarity**: Examine scholars' familiarity with specific research projects, including their understanding of the application process and the quality of preparation materials.

3. **Use the two - stage least squares (2SLS) model**:
- Combine the above three instrumental variables and use the 2SLS model to isolate the endogeneity problem, thereby more accurately evaluating the effect of research funding.

### Main Findings

- Receiving research funding can indeed significantly increase scholars' scientific research output and influence.
- However, this funding has not significantly increased scholars' opportunities to publish in more prestigious journals.

### Formula Explanation

The formulas involved in the article are presented in Markdown format as follows:

- Calculation formulas for average citation times and average CiteScore:
\[
\text{Citations}_{ti} = \sum_{z = 0}^{n}\text{Citation}_{z,ti}
\]
\[
\text{CiteScore}_{ti} = \sum_{z = 0}^{n}\text{CiteScore}_{z,ti}
\]

- Calculation formula for academic age:
\[
\text{Age}_{\text{academic}}=\text{Year}_{\text{award}} - 1-\text{Year}_{\text{initial}}
\]

Through these methods, the author hopes to provide a more reliable and clear evaluation of the research funding effect and provide new perspectives and tools for future research.