Sport and Oral History
Carly Adams,Mike Cronin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2019.1698550
2019-09-22
The International Journal of the History of Sport
Abstract:1 Lynn Abrams, <i>Oral History Theory</i> (London: Routledge, 2010), 1.2 Ibid.3 Alessandro Portelli, 'The Peculiarities of Oral History', <i>History Workshop</i>, 12 (autumn 1981): 99–100.4 Robert Perks and Alistair Thomson, <i>The Oral History Reader</i>. 3rd ed. (London: Routledge, 2015).5 See, for example, Roy Rosenzweig, <i>Eight Hours for What We Will: Workers and Leisure in an Industrial City, 1870</i><i>–</i><i>1920</i> (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983); E. John B. Allen, 'Values and Sport: The Development of New England Skiing 1870–1940', <i>Oral History Review</i> 13, no. 1 (1985): 55–76; and William J. Baker, <i>Jesse Owens: An American Life</i> (Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1986).6 See, for example, Susan K. Cahn, <i>Coming on Strong: Gender and Sexuality in Twentieth-century Women's Sport</i> (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994); and Jennifer Hargreaves, <i>Sporting Females: Critical Issues in the History and Sociology of Women's Sports</i> (New York: Routledge, 1994).7 Fiona Skillen and Carol Osborne, 'It's Good to Talk: Oral History, Sports History and Heritage', <i>The International Journal of the History of Sport</i> 32, no. 15 (2015): 1883–98.8 In the context of sport history see Skillen and Osborne, 'It's Good to Talk',' 1883–1898.9 Katherine Kohler Reissman, 'Analysis of Personal Narratives', in <i>Qualitative Research in Social Work</i>, ed. Anne E. Fortune, William J. Reid and Robert L. Miller (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), 170.10 In the context of historical sub-fields using oral history, a business history example provides a useful analysis of oral history and the narrative turn. See Janis Thiessen, 'The Narrative Turn, Corporate Storytelling and Oral History: Canada's Petroleum Oral History Project and Truth and Reconciliation Commission Call to Action No. 92', <i>Enterprise and Society</i> 20, no. 1 (2019): 60–73.11 Oral history is not a monolithic approach and sport historians, as Osmond and Phillips do in this issue, should consider how different societal groups require specific oral history approaches and methodologies. See for example, Kevin P. Murphy, Jennifer L. Pierce, and Jason Ruiz, 'What Makes Queer Oral History Different?', <i>Oral History Review</i> 43, no. 1 (2016): 1–24; and Iona Radu, 'Blurred Boundaries, Feminisms and Indigenisms: Cocreating an Indigenous Oral History for Decolonization', <i>Oral History Review</i> 45, no. 1 (2018): 29–47.12 Despite the longevity of oral history as a methodology, it is perhaps public history and the embrace of heritage (in many forms) which has come to populate the study of sport history. This means that it is the presentation and consumption of sport history through museums and so on which is favoured over the collection of sport history testimony. See Josh Howard, 'On Sport, Public History and Public Sport History', <i>Journal of Sport History</i> 45, no. 1 (2018): 24–40.13 Fiona Skillen and Carol Osborne, 'It's Good to Talk', 1889.14 See Gary Osmond and Murray G. Phillips, eds., <i>Sport History in the Digital Era</i> (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2015).15 For a discussion of these issues see 'Doing Sport History in the Digital Present', a special issue of <i>Journal of Sport History</i> 44, no. 2 (2017): 135–366.16 The key text is John Neuenschwander, <i>Oral History and the Law</i> (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009) and the chapter on legal and ethical considerations in Barbara W. Sommer and Mary Kay Quinlan, <i>The Oral History Manual</i> (Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield, 2018), 31–47.17 Abrams, <i>Oral History Theory</i>, 1.No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.