Quantity Does Not Always Mean Quality: The Importance of Qualitative Social Science in Conservation Research
Niki A. Rust,Amber Abrams,Daniel W. S. Challender,Guillaume Chapron,Arash Ghoddousi,Jenny A. Glikman,Catherine H. Gowan,Courtney Hughes,Archi Rastogi,Alicia Said,Alexandra Sutton,Nik Taylor,Sarah Thomas,Hita Unnikrishnan,Amanda D. Webber,Gwen Wordingham,Catherine M. Hill
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1333661
2017-07-05
Abstract:Qualitative methods are important to gain a deep understanding of complex problems and poorly researched areas. They can be particularly useful to help explain underlying conservation problems. However, the significance in choosing and justifying appropriate methodological frameworks in conservation studies should be given more attention to ensure data are collected and analysed appropriately. We explain when, why, and how qualitative methods should be used and explain sampling strategies in qualitative studies. To improve familiarity with qualitative methods among natural scientists, we recommend expanding training in social sciences and increasing collaboration with social scientists. Given the scale of human impacts on the environment, this type of nuanced analytical skill is critical for progressing biodiversity conservation efforts.
sociology,environmental studies,development studies,regional & urban planning