Abstract:Purpose Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on the integrated Elekta Unity magnetic resonance (MR)‐linac requires routine quality assurance to verify delivery accuracy and system data transfer. In this work, our objective was to develop and validate a novel automated end‐to‐end test suite that verifies data transfer between multiple software platforms and quantifies the performance of multiple machine subcomponents critical to the ART process. Methods We designed and implemented a software tool to quantify the MR and megavoltage (MV) isocenter coincidence, treatment couch positioning consistency, isocenter shift accuracy for the adapted plan as well as the MLC and jaw position accuracy following the beam aperture adaptation. Our tool employs a reference treatment plan with a simulated isocenter shift generated on an MR image of a readily available phantom with MR and MV visible fiducials. Execution of the test occurs within the standard adapt‐to‐position (ATP) clinical workflow with MV images collected of the delivered treatment fields. Using descriptive statistics, we quantified uncertainty in couch positioning, isocentre shift as well as the jaw and MLC positions of the adapted fields. We also executed sensitivity measurements to evaluate the detection algorithm's performance. Results We report the results of 301 daily testing instances. We demonstrated consistent tracking of the MR‐to‐MV alignment with respect to the established value and to detect small changes on the order of 0.2 mm following machine service events. We found couch position consistency relative to the test baseline value was within 95% CI [–0.31, 0.26 mm]. For phantom shifts that form the basis for the plan adaptation, we found agreement between MV‐image‐detected phantom shift and online image registration, within ± 1.5 mm in all directions with a 95% CI difference of [–1.29, 0.79 mm]. For beam aperture adaptation accuracy, we found differences between the planned and detected jaw positions had a mean value of 0.27 mm and 95% CI of [–0.29, 0.82 mm] and –0.17 mm and 95% CI of [–0.37, 0.05 mm] for the MLC positions. Automated fiducial detected accuracy was within 0.08 ± 0.20 mm of manual localization. Introduced jaw and MLC position errors (1–10 mm) were detected within 0.55 mm (within 1 mm for 15/256 instances for the jaws). Phantom shifts (1.3 or 5 mm in each cardinal direction) from a reference position were detected within 0.26 mm. Conclusions We have demonstrated the accuracy and sensitivity of a daily end‐to‐end test suite capable of detecting errors in multiple machine subcomponents including system data transfer. Our test suite evaluates the entire treatment workflow and has captured system communication issues prior to patient treatment. With automated processing and the use of a standard vendor‐provided phantom, it is possible to expand to other Unity sites.

Quality assurance of non-coplanar, volumetric-modulated arc therapy employing a C-arm linear accelerator, featuring continuous patient couch rotation

SU-FF-T-174: A New Device for the Verification of Temporal Function of the 4DCT and Gating Delivery System

Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Using Multicriteria Optimization for Body and Extremity Sarcoma.

MR‐linac daily semi‐automated end‐to‐end quality control verification

4D registration and 4D verification of lung tumor position for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy using respiratory-correlated cone-beam CT

Development and Longitudinal Analysis of Plan-Based Streamlined Quality Assurance on Multiple Positioning Guidance Systems With Single Phantom Setup

Angular correction methodology and characterization of a high-resolution CMOS array for patient specific quality assurance on a robotic arm linac

Positioning Accuracy During VMAT of Gynecologic Malignancies and the Resulting Dosimetric Impact by a 6-Degree-of-freedom Couch in Combination with Daily Kilovoltage Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Statistical quality control for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery using machine log data

Commissioning of Axesse Accelerator for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Machine log file-based dose verification using novel iterative CBCT reconstruction algorithm in commercial software during volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients

Quality assurance and quality control of IGRT system

Development of an external system for monitoring the couch speed in radiotherapy using continuous bed movement

Initial Clinical Experience of Patient-Specific QA of Treatment Delivery in Online Adaptive Radiotherapy Using a 1.5 T MR-Linac.

Development of a new VMAT QA framework for Mobius3D using control-point specific EPID images

Commissioning and implementing a Quality Assurance program for dedicated radiation oncology MRI scanners

Clinical Feasibility of Using Single-isocentre Non-coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Combined with Non-coplanar Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Five or Fewer Multiple Intracranial Metastases

The performance of a new type accelerator uRT‐linac 506c evaluated by a quality assurance automation system

Commissioning of and Preliminary Experience with a New Fully Integrated Computed Tomography Linac.

Ultra-fast treatment plan optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

Technical note: A simple method for patient‐specific quality assurance for lateral targets on a 1.5 T MR‐Linac