Response to Comment on “Quantifying hot carrier and thermal contributions in plasmonic photocatalysis”

Linan Zhou,Dayne F Swearer,Hossein Robatjazi,Alessandro Alabastri,Phillip Christopher,Emily A Carter,Peter Nordlander,Naomi J Halas,Dayne F. Swearer,Emily A. Carter,Naomi J. Halas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw9545
IF: 56.9
2019-05-03
Science
Abstract:Sivan et al . claim that the methods used to distinguish thermal from hot carrier effects in our recent report are inaccurate and that our data can be explained by a purely thermal mechanism with a fixed activation energy. This conclusion is invalid, because they substantially misinterpret the emissivity of the photocatalyst and assume a linear intensity–dependent temperature in their model that is unrealistic.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?