Abstract:The present study, conducted immediately after the 2020 presidential election in the United States, examined whether Democrats' and Republicans' polarized assessments of election legitimacy increased over time. In a naturalistic survey experiment, people (N = 1,236) were randomly surveyed either during the week following Election Day, with votes cast but the outcome unknown, or during the following week, after President Joseph Biden was widely declared the winner. The design unconfounded the election outcome announcement from the vote itself, allowing more precise testing of predictions derived from cognitive dissonance theory. As predicted, perceived election legitimacy increased among Democrats, from the first to the second week following Election Day, as their expected Biden win was confirmed, whereas perceived election legitimacy decreased among Republicans as their expected President Trump win was disconfirmed. From the first to the second week following Election Day, Republicans reported stronger negative emotions and weaker positive emotions while Democrats reported stronger positive emotions and weaker negative emotions. The polarized perceptions of election legitimacy were correlated with the tendencies to trust and consume polarized media. Consumption of Fox News was associated with lowered perceptions of election legitimacy over time whereas consumption of other outlets was associated with higher perceptions of election legitimacy over time. Discussion centers on the role of the media in the experience of cognitive dissonance and the implications of polarized perceptions of election legitimacy for psychology, political science, and the future of democratic society.

Partisanship vs. Principle: Understanding Public Opinion on Same-Day Registration

Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment

Pork barrel politics, voter turnout, and inequality: An experimental study

Political Awareness, Microtargeting of Voters, and Negative Electoral Campaigning

Partisan Asymmetries in Online Political Activity

Party v. The People: Testing corrective action and supportive engagement in a partisan political context

When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media

A Cri de Coeur for Political Marketing Research in U.S. Midterm and Off-Year Elections

The Efficiency Gap, Voter Turnout, and the Efficiency Principle

Public Spheres in Twitter- and Blogosphere. Evidence from the US

Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?

Divergent views of party positions: How ideology and own issue position shape party perception through convergence and divergence processes

Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading?

Microtargeting, voters’ unawareness, and democracy

Partisanship and the trolley problem: Partisan willingness to sacrifice members of the other party

Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making

The political divide: The case of expectations and preferences

Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information‐Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading?

Positive beliefs about cross-partisan empathy can strengthen Americans' support for democracy

Integrated or Segregated? User Behavior Change after Cross-Party Interactions on Reddit

Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity