Abstract:Abstract A major barrier to climate change mitigation is the political polarization of climate change beliefs. In a global experiment conducted in 60 countries (N = 51,224), we assess the differential impact of eleven climate interventions across the ideological divide. At baseline, we find political polarization of climate change beliefs and policy support globally, with people who reported being liberal believing and supporting climate policy more than those who reported being conservative (Cohen’s d = 0.35 and 0.27, respectively). However, we find no evidence for a statistically significant difference between these groups in their engagement in a behavioral tree planting task. This conceptual-behavioral polarization incongruence results from self-identified conservatives acting despite not believing, rather than self-identified liberals not acting on their beliefs. We also find three interventions (emphasizing effective collective actions, writing a letter to a future generation member, and writing a letter from the future self) boost climate beliefs and policy support across the ideological spectrum, and one intervention (emphasizing scientific consensus) stimulates the climate action of people identifying as liberal. None of the interventions tested show evidence for a statistically significant boost in climate action for self-identified conservatives. We discuss implications for practitioners deploying targeted climate interventions.

The political divide: The case of expectations and preferences

A false divide? Providing information about inequality aligns preferences for redistribution between right- and left-wing voters

Public preferences about government spending: Partisan, social, and attitudinal sources of policy differences

Political rule (vs. opposition) predicts whether ideological prejudice is stronger in U.S. conservatives or progressives

Ideology, Information, and Social Welfare Preferences

The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research

Do you really believe that? The effect of economic incentives on the acceptance of real-world data in a polarized context

Political Ideology and Attitudinal Ambivalence: Investigating the Role of Ideological Extremity

Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity

Registered report: Cognitive ability, but not cognitive reflection, predicts expressing greater political animosity and favouritism

Exposure to Extremely Partisan News from the Other Political Side Shows Scarce Boomerang Effects

Like, Post, and Distrust? How Social Media Use Affects Trust in Government

Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading?

The differential impact of climate interventions along the political divide in 60 countries

Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information‐Seeking Behavior: Motivated Reasoning or Cheerleading?

People believe political opponents accept blatant moral wrongs, fueling partisan divides

Correcting misperceptions of partisan opponents is not effective at treating democratic ills

Social and political trust diverge during a crisis

The Great Divide: Drivers of Polarization in the US Public

Reducing Polarization on Abortion, Guns and Immigration: An Experimental Study

Ambivalent attitudes promote support for extreme political actions