Abstract:Purpose: To perform the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese Version (MOXFQ-Ch) through a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the original questionnaire.Material and methods: Three hundred and sixty nine patients (241 women/128 men, 48.75 ± 8.17 years old) with a diagnosis of hallux valgus foot (237 both feet; 74 right foot; 58 left foot) participated in this observational study. A translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire to Chinese was developed. Each participant completed twice the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire. In addition, the psychometric characteristics of Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese Version were analyzed for internal consistency, construct validity and criterion validity (EuroQoL-5D; Short-Form 12v2; Foot Functional Index were used).Results: The internal consistency of the different sub-scales and total value of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese Version ranged between 0.976 (walking/standing) and 0.991 (pain). Moreover, in the item response analysis, the results ranged between 0.973 (walking/standing) and 0.998 (pain). The standard error of the measurement scores ranged between 1.071 (social interaction) and 1.864 (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese Version total value). The values of Minimal Detectible Change 90 were 4342. In addition, values of the root mean square error of approximation and Goodness-of-fit index were: 0.076 and 0.916 respectively. For criterion validity, were used the questionnaires: Short-Form 12v2, Foot Function Index (Chinese Version), and EuroQol-5D. Correlations with the three factors show a "r" value ranged between 0.104 (Factor 1 – SF12v2-Sub-scale) to 0.819 (FFI-Ch).Conclusions: The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire has been translated and culturally adapted from the original version into Chinese. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese Version has shown excellent internal consistency, external validity ranges from moderate to excellent (depending on the questionnaire used) and, demonstrated a structure of one factor psychometrically supported. Consequently, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese Version could be introduced into Chinese-speaking clinical and research settings to assess and monitor patients with hallux valgusManchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire has been cross-cultural adapted from the original version to Chinese.Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese Version have been reported satisfactory psychometric properties and consistent results.Chinese speaking clinician and researcher, could use the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese Version to assess and follow up patients with food and ankle disease.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the following problems: 1. **Translation and cross - cultural adaptation**: Translate the Manchester - Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) into Chinese and carry out cross - cultural adaptation to ensure its applicability and validity in the Chinese cultural and linguistic environment. 2. **Verify psychometric characteristics**: Evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of MOXFQ (MOXFQ - Ch), including internal consistency, construct validity and criterion validity, to ensure its reliability and validity in clinical and research. ### Specific objectives: - **Translation and cross - cultural adaptation**: Through a multi - step translation and back - translation process, ensure that MOXFQ - Ch is conceptually equivalent to the original version. - **Internal consistency**: Evaluate the internal consistency of each sub - scale and the total score of MOXFQ - Ch to ensure the stability and reliability of the questionnaire. - **Structural validity**: Through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, evaluate the structural validity of MOXFQ - Ch and determine whether it retains the three - factor structure of the original questionnaire. - **Criterion validity**: Through correlation analysis with other validated questionnaires (such as FFI - Ch, SF - 12V2 and EuroQoL - 5D), evaluate the criterion validity of MOXFQ - Ch. ### Research background: - **The importance of foot diseases**: The feet and ankles are important parts for maintaining human contact with the ground, transmitting internal forces, absorbing ground reaction forces, maintaining balance and walking. Hallux valgus (HV) is one of the most common foot deformities in adults, which seriously affects the quality of life and function of patients. - **Application of self - reported outcome measurement tools**: In recent years, self - reported outcome measurement tools (SROMs) have been more and more widely used in clinical and research because of their low cost, reliability and specificity. ### Methods: - **Participants**: 369 patients (241 females/128 males, with an average age of 48.75 ± 8.17 years) diagnosed with hallux valgus. - **Translation and cross - cultural adaptation process**: Including independent translation, version comparison, back - translation, committee review, pre - test and final version modification steps. - **Data collection**: All participants completed MOXFQ - Ch twice, with an interval of three days. At the same time, they completed FFI - Ch, SF - 12V2 and EuroQoL - 5D questionnaires to evaluate external validity. - **Data analysis**: Use SPSS software for statistical analysis, including descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov - Smirnov test, internal consistency analysis, standard error of measurement, minimum detectable change, factor analysis and correlation analysis. ### Results: - **Internal consistency**: The internal consistency coefficients of each sub - scale and the total score of MOXFQ - Ch are between 0.976 and 0.991, indicating extremely high internal consistency. - **Structural validity**: The results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis show that the best model of MOXFQ - Ch is a one - factor structure, rather than the three - factor structure of the original questionnaire. The RMSEA value is 0.076 and the GFI value is 0.916, indicating a good model fit. - **Standard validity**: The correlation analysis between MOXFQ - Ch and FFI - Ch, SF - 12V2 and EuroQoL - 5D shows that its standard validity ranges from weak to strong, but generally shows a good correlation. ### Conclusions: - **The validity of MOXFQ - Ch**: MOXFQ - Ch shows extremely high internal consistency, good structural validity and standard validity in the Chinese environment and can be used to evaluate and monitor the foot function and quality of life of patients with hallux valgus. - **Clinical and research applications**: MOXFQ - Ch can be widely used by Chinese users in clinical and research to evaluate and track patients with foot and ankle diseases.

Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese version (MOXFQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity analysis of the Cantonese-Chinese Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire for Foot and Ankle Disorder (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire HK)

Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index as tool to measure patients with foot and ankle functional limitations

Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation

The Chinese Version of Oxford Depression Questionnaire: A Validation Study in Patients with Mood Disorders

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

The Chinese Version of Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire (OQLQ-C): Translation, Reliability, and Validity

Localization, Reliability and Validity of the Patient Outcome Measures Quationaire

Adaptation and Validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form Scale for Chinese Diabetic Foot Ulcers Individuals

Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders

Cross-cultural translation and validation of the Chinese Oxford Knee Score and the Activity and Participation Questionnaire

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Chronic Heart Failure Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (CHFQOLQ-20)

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Knee Osteoarthritis Fears and Beliefs Questionnaire

MULTI-CENTERED LINGUISTIC ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF SHORT-FORM MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE-2

Chinese Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation

Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

Development of a valid Chinese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders

Measurement properties of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire: A systematic review

[Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Clinical Application of Meniere's Disease Outcomes Questionnaire].