Abstract:PURPOSE: To perform a cultural adaptation and validation study (internal and external) of the FAAM questionnaire to create the Chinese version of the questionnaire (FAAM-Ch).MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two independent professional native translators performed a translation from English to Chinese and reverse translation. Psychometric properties analysis: Internal consistency of measure was analysed through the Cronbach's α coefficients. After extraction by maximum likelihood (EML), the structure factor and construct validity was analysed; to extract a factor, it was necessary to complete the following three requirements: ≥10% of variance, Eigenvalue >1.0 and scree plot inflection point. Standard error measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change 90 (MDC90) were calculated. FFI-Taiwan version, SF12v2, and EuroQol5D were used for criterion validity analysis.RESULTS: The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) for specific FAAM-Ch subscales was 0.879 (ADL) and 0.901 (Sport); test-retest analysis (interclass correlation) item ranging between 0.758 and 0.970 (ADL: 0758-0946; Sport: 0.911-0.970). Measures error: 3.449% (MDC90) and 1.478% (SEM). Chi-squared value =15228.74 and gl 406) (p < 0.001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Oklin values (0.919). The correlation level with the FFI is strong, with SF12v2 is between poor and strong and with EuroQoL5d is between moderate and strong Conclusions: FAAM-Chinese version has satisfactory "transversal" psychometric properties, facilitating the inclusion of FAAM-Chinese into research and clinical practice. Implications for Rehabilitation Cross-cultural adaptation of the FAAM-Ch has been performed from the original version. The psychometric properties of the FAAM-Ch indicate satisfactory and consistent results (particularly in the internal consistence, reliability and criterion validity) with the original version. FAAM-Ch can be used by Chinese speaking clinicians and researches.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to carry out cultural adaptation and validation in Chinese of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in order to create a Chinese - version questionnaire (FAAM - Ch). Specifically, the research objectives include: 1. **Cultural Adaptation**: Translate the FAAM questionnaire from English into Chinese and ensure its conceptual equivalence, making it suitable for use in the context of Chinese culture and language. 2. **Internal and External Validation**: Evaluate the internal consistency and external validity of FAAM - Ch through a series of psychometric analyses to ensure its reliability and validity among Chinese patients. ### Main Research Contents and Methods - **Translation and Cross - cultural Adaptation**: Conduct forward and backward translations by independent professional native - language translators to ensure the conceptual and cultural equivalence of the questionnaire. - **Sample Selection**: The research subjects are patients over 18 years old, whose mother tongue is Chinese and who suffer from musculoskeletal diseases of the foot and ankle, admitted to a hospital in Tai'an, Shandong. - **Psychometric Analyses**: - **Internal Consistency**: Evaluate by Cronbach's α coefficient. - **Factor Structure and Construct Validity**: Conduct exploratory factor analysis by the Maximum Likelihood Extraction (MLE). - **Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimum Detectable Change 90 (MDC90)**: Used to evaluate measurement error. - **Criterion Validity**: Evaluate by correlation analysis with other validated questionnaires (such as FFI - Taiwan, SF - 12v2, EuroQoL - 5D). ### Main Results - **Internal Consistency**: The Cronbach's α coefficients of FAAM - Ch are 0.879 for the ADL sub - scale and 0.901 for the Sport sub - scale respectively, indicating good internal consistency. - **Test - retest Reliability**: The test - retest correlation coefficients (ICC) are between 0.758 and 0.970, indicating excellent test - retest reliability. - **Factor Structure**: The results of exploratory factor analysis show that the factor structure of FAAM - Ch is slightly different from the original version, but still generally meets expectations. - **Criterion Validity**: The correlation analysis with FFI - Taiwan, SF - 12v2 and EuroQoL - 5D shows that FAAM - Ch has good criterion validity. ### Conclusion FAAM - Ch has satisfactory cross - sectional psychometric properties and can be used in research and clinical practice in China. Although the factor structure of FAAM - Ch is slightly different from the original version, it generally maintains good internal consistency and reliability. The introduction of this tool will be helpful for Chinese users to evaluate and monitor patients with foot and ankle dysfunction.

Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot Function Index as tool to measure patients with foot and ankle functional limitations

Manchester–Oxford Foot Questionnaire Chinese version (MOXFQ-Ch): a validity and cross-cultural adaptation

Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the ankle joint functional assessment tool (AJFAT) questionnaire

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity analysis of the Cantonese-Chinese Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire for Foot and Ankle Disorder (Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire HK)

Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Measurement properties of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire: A systematic review

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire (IdFAI-Sp)

Development of a valid Chinese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.

Validity and reliability of the English version of the Diabetic Foot Self-Care Questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Fonseca anamnestic index for temporomandibular disorders

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument

Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Family Management Measure

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the traditional Chinese Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parental Burden questionnaire into simplified Chinese for use in mainland China

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Face Validity of the Functional Mobility Assessment into Brazilian Portuguese

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Measurement Properties of the VISA-A Questionnaire for Chinese Patients with Achilles Tendinopathy.