Abstract:Background: Controversy surrounding Family Presence during Resuscitation (FPDR) continues internationally. The attitudes of medical professionals toward FPDR are particularly important for its clinical implementation. Currently, there is a lack of validated tools to evaluate medical professionals' perceptions of FPDR in China. The study aimed to: (1) Cross-culturally adapt and validate the Family Presence Risk-Benefit Scale (FPR-BS) and the Self-Confidence Scale (FPS-CS) for use in China; and (2) investigate the nurses' perceptions of FPDR and explore the relationships between the nurses' perceptual variables and demographic variables. Methods: The English version of the FPR-BS and FPS-CS underwent a rigorous process of translation, back-translation, proofreading, and cultural adaptation to create the Chinese versions. In the first stage, a sample of 200 nurses were recruited to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales. In the second stage, a larger cohort 519 nurses were invited to assess their perceptions of FPDR and the relationships between these perceptual variables and demographic variables. Results: Exploratory factorial analysis identified a single dimension for both the FPR-BS and FPS-CS, explaining 43.84% and 48.43% of the variance, respectively. The Scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of the FPR-BS and the FPS-CS was 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. Reliability assessments yielded Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.933 for the FPR-BS and 0.930 for the FPS-CS. The split-half reliability coefficients were 0.832 for the FPR-BS and 0.835 for the FPS-CS, while the retest reliability coefficients were 0.742 and 0.927, respectively. The average scores obtained were 2.76 (SD = 0.52) for the FPR-BS and 3.43 (SD = 0.58) for the FPS-CS. Statistical analyses revealed that factors such as patient type, family members' prior experience with resuscitation, and the number of times nurses invited family members during resuscitation significantly influenced perceptions of the benefits and risks associated with FPDR (P < 0.05). Furthermore, obtaining certification as an intensive care specialist was positively associated with nurses' self-confidence in managing FPDR (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The FPR-BS and FPS-CS were validated as effective instruments for measuring nurses' perceptions of PFDR, demonstrating acceptable levels of validity and reliability. While nurses reported fewer benefits and greater risks of FPDR, they exhibited increased self-confidence in managing family presence during resuscitation.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Knee Osteoarthritis Fears and Beliefs Questionnaire

Questionnaires to Examine Back Pain Beliefs Held by Health Care Professionals A Psychometric Evaluation of Simplified Chinese Versions

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Tamil Version of Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in Chronic Low Back Pain

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Traditional Chinese version of the Fear of Falling Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire in Taiwanese community-dwelling adults

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the traditional Chinese Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parental Burden questionnaire into simplified Chinese for use in mainland China

Translation and Validation of the Short Form of the Fear of Dental Pain Questionnaire in China

Foot and ankle ability measure to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders: a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation and validation

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Chinese validation of the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ) in college students

Adaption and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Low Back Pain Knowledge questionnaire (sC-LKQ)

Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)

Simplified Chinese Version of the Back Pain Function Scale (BPFS) for Patients with Low Back Pain

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Attitudes and Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease Risk Perception Questionnaire

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Benefit Finding Questionnaire for people with mental disorders

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of fear of hospitalization scale among outpatients: A validation study

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the family presence risk-benefit and self-confidence scales in Chinese nurses