Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders

Wei Wang,Jun Sheng,Yinchao Tang,Qingyun Xie,Meng Wei,Zhiqiang Li,Wei Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03314-1
IF: 2.562
2020-05-25
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Abstract:Abstract Background The aims of this study were to adapt the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) questionnaire into a simplified Chinese version and to assess its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) disorders. Methods The simplified Chinese version of the IdFAI (SC-IdFAI) questionnaire was developed with a five-step procedure involving cross-cultural translation and adaptation. Three questionnaires, including the SC-IdFAI, Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), were administered to the recruited patients. Then, the Cronbach’s alpha value, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), Spearman’s correlation coefficient ( r s ), effect size (ES), and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SC-IdFAI questionnaire. Results A total of 131, 119, and 86 patients with CAI successfully completed the first, second, and third rounds of the questionnaires, respectively. Good or excellent internal consistency and test–retest reliability were found for the overall scale and subscales of the SC-IdFAI questionnaire. The values for the SEM (1.346) and MDC (3.73) were low, indicating that small clinical changes can be detected by the SC-IdFAI questionnaire. The correlations of the SC-IdFAI with FAAM and SF-36 were generally in agreement with the a priori hypotheses (85%, 34/40), suggesting the SC-IdFAI questionnaire has good construct validity. Moreover, the results suggest that the SC-IdFAI (ES = 1.123 and SRM = 1.554) has an acceptable level of responsiveness. Conclusion The SC-IdFAI scale may be an effective tool, and it is responsive, reliable and valid for the assessment of Chinese patients suffering from CAI.
orthopedics,rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to translate and adapt the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) into a simplified Chinese version (SC - IdFAI), and evaluate its reliability, validity and responsiveness in Chinese - speaking patients with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI). Specifically, the research objectives include: 1. **Translation and cultural adaptation**: Translate the English version of the IdFAI questionnaire into simplified Chinese and carry out cultural adaptation to ensure its applicability and accuracy in the Chinese context. 2. **Evaluating reliability**: Evaluate the consistency and test - retest reliability of the SC - IdFAI questionnaire by calculating Cronbach's α value, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC). 3. **Evaluating validity**: Evaluate the construct validity of the SC - IdFAI questionnaire by analyzing the correlation between the SC - IdFAI questionnaire and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Medical Outcomes Study Short - Form 36 (SF - 36) through Spearman correlation coefficient (\( r_s \)). 4. **Evaluating responsiveness**: Evaluate the sensitivity of the SC - IdFAI questionnaire to changes before and after treatment by calculating Effect Size (ES) and Standardized Response Mean (SRM). Through these evaluations, the research aims to verify whether the SC - IdFAI questionnaire can be used as an effective tool to assess the chronic ankle instability status of Chinese patients.