Abstract:Study Design. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was translated and then adapted and validated. Objective. Translation of the RMDQ into simplified Chinese characters (SCRMDQ), and its cross-cultural adaptation and validation in patients with low back pain with or without radicular leg pain. Summary of Background Data. The RMDQ is used worldwide and versions in traditional Chinese characters are available in Hong Kong and Taiwan. But there is no version in simplified Chinese characters for use in Mainland China. Methods. The original version of the RMDQ was translated and back-translated, and then cross-cultural adaptation of the simplified Chinese version was performed following published guidelines. The SCRMDQ was validated in 150 patients, 30 of whom finished the prefinal SCRMDQ and helped determine the final version. The remaining 120 patients were asked to complete the final SCRMDQ, simplified Chinese Oswestry Disability Index (SCODI), and visual analogue scale. Reliability was assessed with the final version using internal consistency by the Cronbach alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient; structural validity was evaluated by correspondence analysis. Then comparison of SCRMDQ and SCODI was performed. Results. A total of 116 patients in the final validation study finished the questionnaires completely. Their mean age was 52.17 +/- 11.95 years (range, 22-78 yr) and the mean low back pain duration was 42.04 +/- 60.94 months (range, 2-480 mo). The average time taken was 4.11 +/- 1.48 minutes (range, 2-9 min) on SCRMDQ and 7.37 +/- 3.98 minutes (range, 3-30 min) on SCODI. The mean SCRMDQ, SCODI, and visual analogue scale scores were 14.07 +/- 4.79 (range, 2-24), 23.98 +/- 10.38 (range, 2-47), and 57.17 +/- 20.72 (range, 0-95), respectively. In the final test, the Cronbach a for internal consistency was 0.826 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.947; both showed adequate acceptance. Positive and statistically significant correlations were found between SCRMDQ and SCODI (r = 0.791, P < 0.01) and visual analogue scale (r = 0.493, P < 0.01), indicating sufficient structural validation. Most patients preferred SCRMDQ to SCODI, because it was simpler to understand and easier to finish. Conclusion. The SCRMDQ was reliable and valid as a low back pain measurement tool in patients with or without radicular leg pain in Mainland China. The further use and research with the questionnaire were recommended.

An Investigation into the Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III)

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure Ⅱ

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Self-Report Version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR): Rasch Psychometric Analysis and Online Application

Reliability Validity and Responsiveness of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure 4th Version in a Multicultural Setup.

A Multi-Center International Study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Version IV: Rasch Psychometric Validation

Reference Values and Cutoff Scores of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III to Determine Independence for Wheelchair Users and Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire for Discharged Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Validation Study of the Chinese Version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Mainland China.

Cross-cultural and Psychometric Property Assessment of the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale in Chinese Patients with Spinal Cord Injury.

The Inter-Rater Reliability of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Set for Spinal Cord Injury Nursing.

Assessment of ability realization using the 4th version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure

Lack of Knowledge and Training Are the Major Obstacles in Application of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) in China

Reliability and validity study of the Chinese version of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale in patients with cerebellar injury

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Preliminary Validation Study of the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Scales for People with Spinal Cord Injury in Mainland China.

Psychometric Properties of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Set for Spinal Cord Injury Nursing Based on Rasch Analysis

The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Chinese Version Simplified Modified Rankin Scale Questionnaire(2011)

Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the simplified Chinese version of the identification of functional ankle instability questionnaire in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders

Development of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties evaluation

Validation of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in mainland China

The reliability and validity of a slightly revised Chinese version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire