Localization, Reliability and Validity of the Patient Outcome Measures Quationaire

Huan LIU,Li NING,Wen ZHANG,Changrong YUAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2019.02.001
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To conduct Chinese and cultural adjustments to the English version of the Outcome Measures Questionnaire (OMQ) , and to conduct a survey with the Chinese version of the questionnaire.Methods The Chinese version of OMQ was finished by FACIT translation standard. The Chinese version of the questionnaire was culturally debugged through expert consultation and cognitive interviews by medical staff.By convenience sampling method, totally 351 clinical medical staffs from the hoptials in Shanghai, Zhejiang and Nanjiang were surveyed, and the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of OMQ was analyzed after the survey. Results The data analysis showed that the "General Attitude" and "Feedback Attitude" dimensions of the Chinese version of the OMQ questionnaire had the Cronbach's α coefficients of 0.860 and 0.778, respectively.The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.907. The exploratory factor analysis extracted three common factors, which named "General Attitude", "Negative Attitude" and "Practical Barrier". The item factor loading was from 0.636 to 0.857, and these three common factors can explain 63.37% of the total variation. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 3-factor model fited well (χ2/df=2.207, CFI=0.953, RMSEA=0.059). Conclusions The Chinese version of the OMQ questionnaire retains 22 items from the original English version of the questionnaire. It has good measurement properties and can be used as a reliable tool to measure the attitude of Chinese medical staff on patient outcomes measures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?