Abstract:[Background] The proton charge radius extracted from recent muonic hydrogen Lamb shift measurements is significantly smaller than that extracted from atomic hydrogen and electron scattering measurements. [Purpose] In an attempt to understand the discrepancy, we review high-precision electron scattering results from Mainz, Jefferson Lab, Saskatoon and Stanford. [Method] We make use of stepwise regression techniques using the $F$-test as well as the Akaike information criterion to systematically determine the predictive variables to use for a given set and range of electron scattering data as well as to provide multivariate error estimates. [Results] Starting with the precision, low four-momentum transfer ($Q^2$) data from Mainz (1980) and Saskatoon (1974), we find that a stepwise regression of the Maclaurin series using the $F$-test as well as the Akaike information criterion justify using a linear extrapolation which yields a value for the proton radius that is consistent with the result obtained from muonic hydrogen measurements. Applying the same Maclaurin series and statistical criteria to the 2014 Rosenbluth results on $G_E$ from Mainz, we again find that the stepwise regression tends to favor a radius consistent with the muonic hydrogen radius but produces results that are extremely sensitive to the range of data included in the fit. Making use of the high-$Q^2$ data on $G_E$ to select functions which extrapolate to high $Q^2$, we find that a Padé ($N=M=1$) statistical model works remarkably well, as does a dipole function with a 0.84 fm radius, $G_E(Q^2) = ( 1 + Q^2/0.66\,\mathrm{GeV}^2)^{-2}$. [Conclusions] From this statistical analysis, we conclude that the electron scattering result and the muonic hydrogen result are consistent. It is the atomic hydrogen results that are the outliers.

A measurement of the atomic hydrogen Lamb shift and the proton charge radius

Determining the size of the proton

The Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen and the electric rms radius of the proton

Proton size from precision experiments on hydrogen and muonic hydrogen atoms

The Proton Radius from Electron Scattering Data

Proton Radius: A Puzzle or a Solution!?

The Charge Radius of the Proton

Brief review of the theory of the muonic hydrogen Lamb shift and the proton radius

Review of experimental and theoretical status of the proton radius puzzle

Proton structure from the measurement of 2S-2P transition frequencies of muonic hydrogen

Direct comparison of using a Z-transformation instead of the traditional for extraction of the proton radius from scattering data

The alpha particle charge radius, the radion and the proton radius puzzle

Extraction of the proton charge radius from experiments

Nuclear structure corrections to the Lamb shift in $μ^3$He$^+$ and $μ^3$H

The alpha and helion particle charge radius difference from spectroscopy of quantum-degenerate helium

Proton Mass Shift in Muonic Hydrogen Atom

Polynomial fits and the proton radius puzzle

Nonidentical protons

Measuring the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors of Protons and Antiprotons at small $Q^2$ and the charge radii of hadrons

Precision-Spectroscopic Determination of the Binding Energy of a Two-Body Quantum System: The Hydrogen Atom and the Proton-Size Puzzle

Direct Comparison of using a Z-Transformation instead of the traditional $Q^2$ for for Extraction of the Proton Radius from $e-p$ Scattering Data