M. Ahmadi,B. X. R. Alves,C. J. Baker,W. Bertsche,A. Capra,C. Carruth,C. L. Cesar,M. Charlton,S. Cohen,R. Collister,S. Eriksson,A. Evans,N. Evetts,J. Fajans,T. Friesen,M. C. Fujiwara,D. R. Gill,J. S. Hangst,W. N. Hardy,M. E. Hayden,C. A. Isaac,M. A. Johnson,J. M. Jones,S. A. Jones,S. Jonsell,A. Khramov,P. Knapp,L. Kurchaninov,N. Madsen,D. Maxwell,J. T. K. McKenna,S. Menary,T. Momose,J. J. Munich,K. Olchanski,A. Olin,P. Pusa,C. Ø. Rasmussen,F. Robicheaux,R. L. Sacramento,M. Sameed,E. Sarid,D. M. Silveira,G. Stutter,C. So,T. D. Tharp,R. I. Thompson,D. P. van der Werf,J. S. Wurtele

Abstract:In 1928, Dirac published an equation1 that combined quantum mechanics and special relativity. Negative-energy solutions to this equation, rather than being unphysical as initially thought, represented a class of hitherto unobserved and unimagined particles—antimatter. The existence of particles of antimatter was confirmed with the discovery of the positron2 (or anti-electron) by Anderson in 1932, but it is still unknown why matter, rather than antimatter, survived after the Big Bang. As a result, experimental studies of antimatter3–7, including tests of fundamental symmetries such as charge–parity and charge–parity–time, and searches for evidence of primordial antimatter, such as antihelium nuclei, have high priority in contemporary physics research. The fundamental role of the hydrogen atom in the evolution of the Universe and in the historical development of our understanding of quantum physics makes its antimatter counterpart—the antihydrogen atom—of particular interest. Current standard-model physics requires that hydrogen and antihydrogen have the same energy levels and spectral lines. The laser-driven 1S–2S transition was recently observed8 in antihydrogen. Here we characterize one of the hyperfine components of this transition using magnetically trapped atoms of antihydrogen and compare it to model calculations for hydrogen in our apparatus. We find that the shape of the spectral line agrees very well with that expected for hydrogen and that the resonance frequency agrees with that in hydrogen to about 5 kilohertz out of 2.5 × 1015 hertz. This is consistent with charge–parity–time invariance at a relative precision of 2 × 10−12—two orders of magnitude more precise than the previous determination8—corresponding to an absolute energy sensitivity of 2 × 10−20 GeV.

Precision-Spectroscopic Determination of the Binding Energy of a Two-Body Quantum System: The Hydrogen Atom and the Proton-Size Puzzle

Precision Rydberg State Spectroscopy with Slow Electrons and Proton Radius Puzzle

Proton size from precision experiments on hydrogen and muonic hydrogen atoms

Metrology of Rydberg states of the hydrogen atom

Prospects for the determination of fundamental constants with beyond-state-of-the-art uncertainty using molecular hydrogen ion spectroscopy

Fitting for the energy levels of hydrogen

The alpha and helion particle charge radius difference from spectroscopy of quantum-degenerate helium

Measurement of the $2$S$_{1/2}-8$D$_{5/2}$ transition in hydrogen

Zero-Quantum-Defect Method and the Fundamental Vibrational Interval of

Determining the size of the proton

A measurement of the atomic hydrogen Lamb shift and the proton charge radius

The Proton Radius from Electron Scattering Data

Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen

The Zero-Quantum-Defect Method and the Fundamental Vibrational Interval of H$_2^+$

A tabulation of the bound-state energies of atomic hydrogen

Measuring the Rydberg Constant Using Circular Rydberg Atoms in an Intensity-Modulated Optical Lattice

Proton Radius: A Puzzle or a Solution!?

Laser spectroscopy of a rovibrational transition in the molecular hydrogen ion H 2 +

Two-loop electron self-energy for low nuclear charges

Spectroscopy of atomic hydrogen. How is the Rydberg constant determined?

A fundamental constant in physics gets an update