I. A. Qattan,J. Arrington,K. Aniol,O. K. Baker,R. Beams,E. J. Brash,A. Camsonne,J.-P. Chen,M. E. Christy,D. Dutta,R. Ent,D. Gaskell,O. Gayou,R. Gilman,J.-O. Hansen,D. W. Higinbotham,R. J. Holt,G. M. Huber,H. Ibrahim,L. Jisonna,M. K. Jones,C. E. Keppel,E. Kinney,G. J. Kumbartzki,A. Lung,K. McCormick,D. Meekins,R. Michaels,P. Monaghan,L. Pentchev,R. Ransome,J. Reinhold,B. Reitz,A. Sarty,E. C. Schulte,K. Slifer,R. E. Segel,V. Sulkosky,M. Yurov,X. Zheng

Abstract:The advent of high-intensity, high-polarization electron beams led to significantly improved measurements of the ratio of the proton's charge to electric form factors, GEp/GMp. However, high-$Q^2$ measurements yielded significant disagreement with extractions based on unpolarized scattering, raising questions about the reliability of the measurements and consistency of the techniques. Jefferson Lab experiment E01-001 was designed to provide a high-precision extraction of GEp/GMp from unpolarized cross section measurements using a modified version of the Rosenbluth technique to allow for a more precise comparison with polarization data. Conventional Rosenbluth separations detect the scattered electron which requires comparisons of measurements with very different detected electron energy and rate for electrons at different angles. Our Super-Rosenbluth measurement detected the struck proton, rather than the scattered electron, to extract the cross section. This yielded a fixed momentum for the detected particle and dramatically reduced cross section variation, reducing rate- and momentum-dependent corrections and uncertainties. We measure the cross section vs angle with high relative precision, allowing for extremely precise extractions of GEp/GMp at $Q^2$ = 2.64, 3.20, and 4.10 GeV$^2$. Our results are consistent with traditional extractions but with much smaller corrections and systematic uncertainties, comparable to the uncertainties from polarization measurements. Our data confirm the discrepancy between Rosenbluth and polarization extractions of the proton form factor ratio using an improved Rosenbluth extraction that yields smaller and less-correlated uncertainties than typical of previous Rosenbluth extractions. We compare our results to calculations of two-photon exchange effects and find that the observed discrepancy can be relatively well explained by such effects.

Measuring the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors of Protons and Antiprotons at small $Q^2$ and the charge radii of hadrons

The Proton Charge Radius from Dimuon Photoproduction off the Proton

Method for measuring the charge radii of charged hyperons from the time-like region

The Proton Radius from Electron Scattering Data

The Charge Radius of the Proton

Lattice Calculation of the Proton Charge Radius

Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon from lattice QCD

Precision calculation of the electromagnetic radii of the proton and neutron from lattice QCD

Hadron and light nucleus radii from electron scattering

Direct Comparison of using a Z-Transformation instead of the traditional $Q^2$ for for Extraction of the Proton Radius from $e-p$ Scattering Data

Proton charge radius extraction from muon scattering at MUSE using dispersively improved chiral effective field theory

High precision measurements of the proton elastic electromagnetic form factors and their ratio at $Q^2$ = 0.50, 2.64, 3.20, and 4.10 GeV$^2$

Charge radii of the nucleon from its flavor dependent Dirac form factors

Note on the electromagnetic radius of proton

The alpha and helion particle charge radius difference from spectroscopy of quantum-degenerate helium

Determination of the moments of the proton charge density: is there a proton radius puzzle?

Towards Precision Muonic X-Ray Measurements of Charge Radii of Light Nuclei

Proton structure from the measurement of 2S-2P transition frequencies of muonic hydrogen

Recent Results on Proton Charge Radius and Polarizabilities

Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon from $N_f = 2 + 1$ lattice QCD