Interference Can Affect Response Times to False Items in Category Verification

Thomas M Gruenenfelder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/grbx7

2020-01-06

Abstract:Previous research has found faster response times in category verification tasks to false stimuli pairing highly similar coordinate concepts (“pea—bean”) than to false stimuli pairing less similar coordinate concepts (“pea—onion”). Such a finding indicates that knowledge of which concepts are coordinate to one another is represented within a semantic network. However, the finding has not been entirely consistent. One reason for that inconsistency may be that the faster retrieval of a coordinate association between highly related words is offset by hesitancy on the part of participants to make a “false” response to strongly related stimuli. To test this hypothesis, termed the relation-strength interference hypothesis, participants served in two conditions. In the Similarity condition, they judged whether pairs of words were semantically similar. In the Classification condition, they judged whether pairs of words exhibited a class-inclusion relation “pea—vegetable”) or a coordinate relation. Both conditions included both coordinate items and class-inclusion items. Latencies were longer in the Classification condition than in the Similarity condition. The increase in latency in the Classification condition relative to the Similarity condition, however, was the same for coordinate items as for class-inclusion items, a finding consistent with the relation-strength interference hypothesis.