Abstract:The limited capacity of visual working memory (VWM) requires an efficient information selection mechanism. However, an uneconomical object-based encoding manner of VWM has been consistently found in previous studies. That is, not only the target feature, but also the task-irrelevant features from the same object are extracted into VWM. Besides the totally task-irrelevant feature which is never useful throughout the whole task, there is another kind of “irrelevant feature” that is necessary initially but no longer useful for the left task, termed as key feature in Chen & Wyble (2015)’s Attribute Amnesia studies. Previous studies showed that despite participants could not explicitly report the key feature in a surprise memory test, they had some memory traces for this unreportable information that could still produce an inter-trial priming effect. The current study sought to investigate the status of memory representation of a key feature by directly comparing it with the memory representation of a totally irrelevant feature from the same object (which serves as a baseline). In a series of experiments, participants were asked to memorize one feature of a single object, and then performed a visual search task in which there was either one of the distractors matching the task-irrelevant feature or key feature of the memory item, or there was no match between the memory and search display. Surprisingly, the results convergingly showed that despite a reliable WM-driven attentional bias effect (i.e., longer search time in the match condition than the no-match neutral condition) was generated by a task-irrelevant feature of an object, there was no such an effect triggered by the key feature. These findings suggested that participants might tend to actively inhibit just used information (i.e., key feature), resulting in even weaker memory representation of such information as compared to that of completely task-irrelevant features.

Evidence of Center-Surround Inhibition in Visual Working Memory Representation

The Role of Location-Context Binding in Nonspatial Visual Working Memory

Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

Overlapping and Distinct Contributions of Stimulus Location and of Spatial Context to Nonspatial Visual Short-Term Memory

Tracking Stimulus Representation Across a 2-Back Visual Working Memory Task

Delay-period Activity in Frontal, Parietal, and Occipital Cortex Tracks Noise and Biases in Visual Working Memory

Do we actively inhibit recently attended but no longer relevant information

Does High Memory Load Kick Task-Irrelevant Information out of Visual Working Memory?

Color category and inter-item interaction influence color working memory codependently

Integrated Encoding of Relations and Objects in Visual Working Memory.

Tracking the mismatch information in visual short term memory: an event-related potential study.

Task-irrelevant features in working memory alter current visual processing

An interference model for visual and verbal working memory.

Spatial working memory and visual working memory share common storage resources

Organization Principles in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Sequential Stimulus Display

Involuntary and Voluntary Processes Compete for Entering the Focus of Attention of Working Memory.

Overlapping neural representations for selection in attention and working memory

Asymmetrical access to color and location in visual working memory

Visual Working-Memory Capacity Load Does Not Modulate Distractor Processing

The Object As the Unit of Interaction Between Visual Working Memory and Visual Attention

Is the Inter-Item Association in Working Memory Resource Demanding? Rejecting a Dual-Route Model